Section 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code: ORGANIZED FRAUD & THE SUPPORT SCAM

Fraud

380 (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or

(b) is guilty

(i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or

(ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction,

where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

How did John Kiska (“Kiska”) drive me (his previously successful wife) to poverty in order to gain strategic advantage during our custody battle? Simple: court-assisted fraud.

1. Michéle Blais (“Blais”, of Victor Vallance Blais) provided terrible advice in 2016 of using my own corporate savings by way of a dividend as “interim financial support” which would later be used against me as “a source of income”. RIDICULOUS
2. Throughout 2017 Kiska refused to provide any meaningful spousal or child support (& failed to share in paying for children’s essentials) as requested in order to force me to bring a Motion for Interim Financial Support.
3. He lied in his commissioned Affidavit: Kiska significantly understated his income, completely lied about my income, lied about the tax treatment of said income and alleged that I refused to seek employment when, in fact, he had destroyed my professional reputation via ongoing slander and libel that spread like wildfire throughout the community.
4. His accomplice, Wade Smith (“Smith”) of Bell Baker LLP, assisted with the fraud by lying to the court.
5. Another accomplice, Justice Julie Audet (“Audet”) of Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice:
   • ignored my Affidavit,
   • relied on Smith’s “oral reasons given” (see paras. x and y) &
   • awarded below-poverty-level support of merely $1,230/month for me and $345/month to care for both Sean and Cate. 
6. The actual amount that should have been awarded was over $7,500/month.
7. So, the modest bungalow that my children adored had to be sold about a year after we moved in, in order to access the equity to be in a position to continue to survive financially as I remained the primary caregiver during the summers and attempted to share parenting time with recalcitrant Kiska.
8. Audet and co-accomplice Justice Pamela MacEachern (“MacEachern”) refused to permit me to bring a Motion to Change the Interim Order, falsely claiming that my only avenue was an appeal (via the crooks that work in Appellant court).
9. Eventually, Kiska stopped paying even the measly support award: I had to apply to Ontario Works and began to receive welfare cheques!!
10. When I eventually brought an action against him in Small Claims court, he attempted… with the assistance of his new accomplice, Cheryl Hess (“Hess”) of Bell Baker LLP … to execute a different type of fraud enabled by the Financial Responsibility Office (“FRO”): The Enforced Revenue Stream Scam.
11. In addition, my right to legislatively-available occupational rent was simply ignored by Smith, Audet, MacEachern, Hess and others: see The Occupational Rent Scam.