June 26, 2025 Archives

which further expose

Ottawa Family Court et al.!**

return to June 2025 Archives || return to “Urgent Motion” || return to twb.ROCKS Canada’s Political Persecution Techniques!


On 20250625, Ottawa’s Family Court responded to my desperate e-mail by asking “Could you please clarify what you are trying to schedule and the purpose of the request?”

This was my 20250626 response:


Ms. Ross,

The hearing “type” and purpose was specified at para. 16(b) of the 20210609 Endorsement (linked below).

As evidenced by:

      • the 11/12-volume Continuing Record for FC-15-2446 and
      • the taxpayer-funded retaliatory maneuver that was FC-19-CP08,

my husband has successfully circumvented Canada’s federal Divorce Act (“DA”) since 2015 by leveraging/exploiting provincial legislation* including Ontario’s Courts of Justice Act (Family Law Rules) and its Child, Youth and Family Services Act. Accordingly, I remain forcibly married and denied all federal DA-codified protections from domestic violence including, but not limited to, access to income, access to my children and access to my assets.

SCJ’s Pamela MacEachern endorsed/forced the ONLY possible next step in her endorsement at para. 16(b): https://twb.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Ex-AN-20210609-Endorsement_court-enabled-fraud-continues-MACEACHERN.pdf.

Despite the errors in law, errors in fact and errors in mixed law and fact, her decision could not be successfully appealed; so, this never-ending divorce has mushroomed into one that reeks of multi-faceted scandal.

This [ordered] “case management conference” should address:

      1. that my 2018 Amended Answer requires revision to include my husband’s 2018-2024 crimes and violations of civil law (from which I continue to suffer),
      2. that the fraudulently-obtained, fraudulent 2018 temporary support order requires amendment to reflect reality (retroactively) and not entirely falsified claims regarding income and
      3. that communication with my fully-deceived children has been perpetually and cruelly denied to ensure not only parental alienation but (likely) irreversible child alienation (when the 2018 OCL recommendation was that I, as the superior parent, receive sole custody).

As my children (who were unlawfully ordered into the hands of my abusive husband despite the fact that “custody and access” fell within the jurisdiction of the federal Divorce Act) are now adults with whom I’ve been denied communication (or even a simple photograph) for over six years, evidence of this undeniable aspect of his abuse should support the extensive damage award that I already received leave to seek from Justice Summers in 2017.

November 2025 will mark one full decade of court-enabled domestic violence and child abuse: I would think that any reasonable court would prioritize remedy for the clear injustices that have been permitted to transpire.

Deirdre Moore / Andee Jak

*my husband also weaponized Canada’s federal Criminal Code via numerous false allegations spanning from 2019 (to have the original divorce trial cancelled) to 20240216.


How did Family Court respond? On 20250627, they sent an e-mail to my husband’s career-criminal lawyer Cheryl Hess (https://twb.rocks/organized-crime/vis/cheryl-hess) and asked:

“May we please get the position of the other party?”

As of 20250708 10:00, I have yet to receive any meaningful response from anyone … again.

Delay – Deny – Destroy

It’s the same modus operandi that is used by Criminal Court and Civil Court: Canada’s legal-judicial system has been fully weaponized to silence [insert noun of choice].


*Copy of this e-mail thread as of 20250627 13:34 is stored at https://twb.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/20250627-1334-email-from-SCJ-Family-Court-re-next-steps-position_FC-15-2446-John-Kiska_SAQOTU_Deirdre-Moore-Sean-Kiska-Cate-Kiska.pdf.