twb.ROCKS discerning the Holy Bible!

Were Cain and Abel twins?

Are we all “God’s children”?

Article started by Andee Sea Cae Jak on December 1, 2023 (last revision: 2025004 09:44 e.s.t.)

Introduction: I first started questioning the legitimacy of Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution in 2019. What else could explain the fact that so many individuals amongst whom I lived had absolutely zero conscience? Why do so many enjoy cruelty? Not yet being aware that our Father exists and that the Bible is truth, I started to consider that, perhaps, Darwin got it wrong: maybe there are multiple “sub-species”* within his catch-all category of “Homo Sapien”.

Fast-forward to 2021, and growing more and more aware of the level of deception into which we have all been born and raised**, one of the first Bible verses that stopped me in my tracks*** was Genesis 3:15:

“And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.”

It didn’t take me long to consider the possibility that Eve’s Cain and Abel were twins; and, the result of a phenomenon that’s been labelled heteropaternal superfecundation. That is, twins from two different fathers.

source: https://hope4afghans.com/programmeimages/wide-6385.jpeg

*A chart which summarizes possible distinctions is stored at https://twb.rocks/organized-crime/descending-into-sociopathy

**The international insanity of that which was labelled COVID-19 sparked my accelerated learning curve regarding government initiatives, politic agendas and academic anomalies. 

***Another was Genesis 1:16 which exposes the heliocentric model as just another theory developed to mask His creation (see (insert link to one-page summary).

(Subheading): With rock-solid conviction, yet practically scripturally illiterate, I embarked upon my journey using multiple methods:

  • purchasing multiple versions of the Bible and multiple interpretation tools*
  • listening to sermons being delivered by a variety of religious leaders (ie. priests, pastors and rabbis) and
  • engaging with other followers of Christ via social media and
  • asking individuals, including so-called “Spiritual Care Advisors”, about their opinions on a variety of verses.

In a nutshell, I learned that nobody agreed on anything and decided that I would have to question everything as I studied whatever Bible I was in a position to read. I would also need the help of The Holy Spirit to comprehend what was left of His Scripture. As I bounced between the Old Testament and the New Testament, I was moved to read the book of Daniel and the book of Amos where I tripped over two other verses:

Daniel 12:4 “… many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.”

Amos 8:12 “… they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the LORD, and shall not find it.”

Fortunately, the jail cell that I was in** had an old Oxford dictionary. The result was the draft article “” (see insert at right).

 

(insert section re: timeline changes used in the KJV, etc.)

link to ideas contained in “Costly Grace” https://twb.rocks/blank-00/living/spirit/000021_costly-grace-by-dietrich-bonhoeffer_saqotu_deirdre-moore-sean-kiska-cate-kiska and “The Battle for the Divinity of Christ“

(Conclusion)

source: (insert link to html version of outline) + change reference to www.twb.rocks

*

**

***

(Subheading): Pride was the most difficult of the “seven sins” for me to comprehend. How could feeling proud be “deadly”?

 

“quote”

 

 

 

I have since been informed that the concept of the “seven deadly sins” was merely a construct of the Roman Catholic Church*; still, it was a useful exercise to improve my relationship with Him. 

source: https://image3.slideserve.com/5707873/the-seven-deadly-sins-l.jpg

*Jonathan Kleck (whom I no longer follow) did an interesting exposé on the Vatican called “You are Exiles”: it is stored at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXJNZL-Ab74

**

(Subheading): John 6:44 and 6:65 suggest there is a pre-requisite to being saved from spending eternity without Him.

John 6:44 “No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.”

John 6:65 “… no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.”

Why would some individuals be excluded from coming unto His Son?

source: 

*

**

(Subheading): Descendents of Cain will walk amongst us until the end.

Matthew 13:30 “Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.”

 

 

 

 

 

If one suspected that they were a “tare”, wouldn’t they do their darndest to pretend they were “wheat”? (link to the hoax that is psychiatry: (insert link))

 

source: https://i.etsystatic.com/15828758/r/il/77df02/4181390269/il_794xN.4181390269_tao4.jpg

*

**

Current sources:

ROUGH NOTES FOR ARTICLE

Genesis 3:15

15And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

Genesis 4:25-26

25And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew. 26And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the LORD.

Genesis 5:3

3And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth: 4And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters: 5And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.

Matthew 23:35

35That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. 36Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. (see arguments for “Satan’s Little Season” of Revelation 7-10 at https://twb.rocks/blank-00/living/spirit/satans-little-season)

Logical Conclusion: “.. the only possible reason for the rejection of his sacrifice must be that Cain was not the legitimate son of Adam, but rather, he was a bastard, since he was the son of the serpent, and therefore he was not qualified to even make a sacrifice to Yahweh God.” regarding Genesis 4:3-5

3And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD. 4And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering: 5But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. 

Logical Conclusion: As it is recorded in John chapter 8, Yahshua Christ had acknowledged His adversaries by telling them: “37 I know that you are offspring of Abraham, but you seek to kill Me because My Word has no place in you. 38 The things which I have seen from My Father I speak; so also you, the things which you have heard from your father you do.” So there Christ denied that these men had the same father as His own, meaning Yahweh. Therefore, knowing what He meant, they protested: “39 They replied and said to Him: ‘Our father is Abraham!’” Technically they were correct, that Abraham was their ancestor. But they were children of Esau and not of Israel, as the history of Judaea over the two centuries leading up to the time of Christ makes manifest. So being of Esau, they were also in part descended from Cain and the Nephilim, as Esau had married Canaanite women, mingled with and lived among the Canaanites, and Canaanites had already mingled with the Kenites, the descendants of Cain, and also the Rephaim and others of the Nephilim, which are the fallen angels. (W.F.)

Now Christ responds again, where we read: “42 Yahshua said to them: ‘If Yahweh was your father you would have loved Me, for I have come from of Yahweh and am here. I have not come by Myself, but He has sent Me. 43 For what reason do you not perceive My speech? Because you are not able to hear My Word! 44 You are the sons of a father: the False Accuser [or Devil]! And you wish to do the desires of your father! He was a murderer from the beginning and did not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him! When he speaks a lie, he speaks from of his own devices, because he is a liar, and his father!’” (W.F.)

 

Logical Conclusion: if one loves God, then he is his brother’s keeper, unlike Cain’s response in Genesis 4:9 (W.F.)

9Then the Lord said to Cain, “Where is your brother Abel?” “I don’t know,” he replied. “Am I my brother’s keeper?”

Also confirmed at 1 John 5:1-3

1Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and everyone who loves the father loves his child as well. 2This is how we know that we love the children of God: by loving God and carrying out his commands. 3In fact, this is love for God: to keep his commands. And his commands are not burdensome, 4for everyone born of God overcomes the world.

Satan is the father of Cain; Adam is the father of Abel. It’s very easy to check it out. Cain is not in Adam’s genealogy. For example: Lameck of Cain had Jubal and Tubal-Cain. Adam’s Lamech had Noah. Also Cain’s Enoch was a builder of cities. Adam’s Enoch was taken by God. (A.K.)

Jesus tells us about Cain’s children and who their father is in John 8:42-47, Matt. 13:24-40, Rev.3:9. Paul talks about them in I John 3:12. (A.K.)

link to pdf version of article

Other articles being developed are stored at https://twb.rocks/blank-00/living/spirit