twb.ROCKS discerning the Holy Bible!

Why do some deny Saint Paul?

Are there risks to claiming Saint Paul was a “false prophet”?


Article started by Andee Sea Cae Jak on July 18, 2025 (last revision: 20250718 14:35 e.s.t.)

This article was inspired by an individual on Twitter who de-constructed why the claim “Saint Paul was a false prophet” is such a slippery slope. (insert commentary) (see original post at https://x.com/cswarketatora/status/1687693684756611072). Pasted below are her (lightly edited) 20230805 arguments.

I see many people questioning (or outright denying) the apostle, Paul. It’s become a controversial issue and it’s not irrelevant. The cabal has always hidden Christ by paganizing His images, usurping Him into all sorts of pagan symbolism and celebration, trying to kill His bloodline, actually killing Him, allegorizing Him and mocking Him to make Him look ridiculous. Eliminating of the notion of Christ is essential to the cabal if their plans for a one world religion (“OWR”) are to succeed. Many are already allegorizing the Bible and/or believe that Christ is some type of “consciousness” and this is where the “Paul-denial” fits in. Let me explain.

Denying the apostle Paul and believing that he is a false apostle, or that he contradicts the Messiah and therefore should be discarded (even though the Messiah Himself called Paul His chosen vessel), is not a decision that can be made without consequences. In my opinion, if one embraces this false belief, and it is a false belief, it’s one hop, skip and a jump and you make a complete shipwreck of your faith and lose your way. It’s sly; and, likely without remedy (unless you catch yourself fast enough).

Why do I say this? If one denies Paul, then one must necessarily discard at least 13 of the 27 books* in the New Testament as he wrote them:

Matthew

Mark

Luke

John

The Acts

Romans

1 Corinthians

2 Corinthians

Galatians

Ephesians

Philippians

Colossians

1 Thessalonians

2 Thessalonians

1 Timothy

2 Timothy

Titus

Philemon

Hebrews

James

1 Peter

2 Peter

1 John

2 John

3 John

Jude

Revelation

*14 if one considers that Paul wrote Hebrews … for the sake of argument, let’s say he didn’t).


So now we have only 14 books left. Immediately after this, one will be forced to discard the book of Acts, which records Paul’s conversion on the road to Damascus and his interaction with Ananias. After all, Ananias was told by the Messiah himself that Paul was His chosen vessel to bear His name to the Gentiles, kings, and the children of Israel. (Acts 9:15)

By discarding Acts, one throws away the entire historical record of the early church, the spread of the Gospel, the Roman and Jewish persecution of the church, its victories, the Day of Pentecost, and so many other foundational and historical accounts. 13 books left now.

13


12

Then one must discard the Gospel of Luke, after all, if Luke wrote Acts and Acts cannot be trusted as truth, out goes his gospel as well. 12 books left now.


Then we have the apostle Peter, who in 2 Peter 3:15-16 called Paul “our beloved brother” and said that Paul’s letters were difficult to understand and were often twisted by unstable people. So, since Peter is no longer reliable, out goes 1 Peter and 2 Peter. See it?

That leaves only 10 books now, out of the original 27 (17 having already been thrown in the bin).

10


9

In Galatians 2:9, Paul says that James, Peter, and John gave him and Barnabas the “right hand of fellowship”. If Paul deniers say Paul is a liar, however, then we cannot take that into consideration. Accordingly, for now, letters of John and James remain. However, if Peter lied when calling Paul his beloved brother (a real apostle would never call a false one his beloved brother), then doesn’t that mean that the affirmation in the gospel of Matthew 16:18 must also be a lie? It says the Messiah commended Peter for the revelation the Father had given him, saying that upon that rock (the revelation that He was the Christ) He would build His church. If Matthew wss also a liar, then his gospel must also be tossed. That leaves 9 books … and only 2 gospels.


But there’s another problem: in John 21:15, Messiah told Peter to feed His sheep. If Peter was a false apostle (after all he called Paul his beloved brother), then John must have also been a liar because the Messiah would never tell a false apostle to feed His sheep. So, now we have to toss ALL of John’s books, which total 5 and we only have 4 books left: Mark, Jude, Hebrews and James.

What a mess it is now. All deliberate, in my opinion. Thanks to the Paul deniers, faith now has to be based on only four books in the New Testament (out of the original 27).

4


3

If the only gospel left, that of Mark, was written by a disciple of Peter, then Paul deniers must discard his gospel too. Now we have no gospels, no record of the Messiah, and basically, the Messiah has been erased from the Scriptures. See it?


Hopefully you can see where it gets to if one denies Paul. In my opinion, this fad is cabal-driven. Although some don’t know they’ve been programmed, do it deliberately. To “deny Christ” is not new for the cabal. And, they’re sneaky. Be careful. ♥️

 Work-in-progress resource hub for those interested in this topic:

  1. The false “false apostle Paul” teaching: a 08:16-minute scripted presentation (https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=s0MxlwQf2Gg) with my transcript of same published at https://twb.rocks/blank-00/living/spirit/deniers-of-saint-paul/bookoflife144-001.
  2. From Twitter’s https://x.com/John_eight_44,   https://christogenea.org/podcasts/community/against-paul-bashers
  3. Insert link to “Top 10 Comments from Demons found in the Bible’: Acts 19:15 “And the evil spirit answered and said, Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are ye?”
  4. x
  5. x
  6. x