twb.ROCKS discerning Scripture!
DRAFT > Why do some think we are already in “Satan’s little season” of Rev 20:7-10?
Are there risks to claiming that we are, or are not?
Article started by Andee Sea Cae Jak on November 23, 2025 (last revision: 20251123 at 11:08 (e.s.t.)
This article was inspired by an individual on Twitter who is adamant that Christ’s Millennial Reign has yet to occur and feels that those who believe that we are already at His Book of Revelation 20:7-10 are wrong and need to be “de-bunked”. (see original posts at insert links). Pasted below are his (lightly edited) 20251122 arguments (ie. draft #1):

(insert his introduction)
Note: The content below has not yet been vetted, reviewed, edited or sourced: it’s simply been re-formatted from the original content using a 4-step process:
- Number the bullet points provided 1 to X
- Classify each bullet point according to draft subheading
- A) Unfulfilled prophecies
- B) Illogical conclusions
- C) Misinterpretation of Scripture
- D) Lack of proof
- X) Other and
- Conclusion
- Place the X bullet points into the y draft subheadings and conclusion area
- Group (if possible) and reorder (if required)
- TO DO > Edit components within each subheading
- TO DO > Source the Scripture and other materials/individuals referenced
Draft #1: (Draft introduction added by editor) There are many reasons not to hold the eschatological view known as “Satan’s Little Season” including the fact that this view relies upon:
-
- Unfulfilled prophecies
- Illogical conclusions
- Misinterpretation of Scripture
- Lack of proof
- Other
I explain each of these issues below.
A. Unfulfilled prophecies
(TO DO > Insert introduction to Biblical prophecy)
Statement Type 1: Required events never occurred
-
-
(OR##-L) insert statement
-
–
- –
- –
- –
-
Statement Type 2: No evidence that required events occurred
-
-
(OR##-L) insert statement
-
–
- –
- –
- –
- –
-
B. Illogical conclusions
(TO DO > Insert introduction to logic and common tactics employed to persuade and/or deceive one’s audience.)
Statement Type 1: Errors
-
- (OR##-L) insert statement
- –
- –
- –
- –
Statement Type 2: Omissions
-
- OR##-L) insert statement
- –
- –
- –
- –
Statement Type 3: Malicious Obfuscation
-
- OR##-L) insert statement
- –
- –
- –
- –
C. Misinterpretation of Scripture
-
- OR##-L) insert statement
- –
- –
- –
- –
D. Lack of Proof
-
- OR##-L) insert statement
- –
- –
- –
- –
E. Other
-
- OR##-L) insert statement
- –
- –
- –
- –
Conclusion
- TO DO > This and many more proofs from the prophecies about the Second Coming and Millennium prove the Little Season doctrine being now wrong. Scripture used for my argument is summarized below and quoted at https://twb.rocks/living/spirit/satans-little-season/sls-opposing-view-02/sls-ov02-links.
Genesis 9:11
Joshua 23:15-16*
Job 38:35
Isaiah 2:4, 34:4, 35:1, 65:16-25, 66:15-24
Jeremiah 30
Ezekiel 37, 47
Daniel 2; 7:13-14; 7:23; 7:25; 7:8,20,24; 12:4; Chapters 2, 7, 8, 11, & 12 especially
Nahum 2:3-4, 3:4
Habakkuk 2:14
Zephaniah 3:9
Zech 5:5-11; 13:3-5; 14:4, 8-9, 16
Matthew 16:28; 21:43; 24:14; 29-31
Mark 13:24-31; 13:30 vs 13:32 & “included in this chapter of Mark 13, Matt 24, and Luke 21. ”
Luke 17:24-25; 29-30; 21:24
John 8:51; 21:21-23
Acts 1:10-12; 3:19-21
Romans 11:25
1 Corinthians 13:1-13; 15:51-52
Colossians 1:23
2 Thessalonians 2:1-12
2 Timothy 2:15-18
2 Peter 3:3-14
Revelation 1:9; 6:11; 6:12-17; 6:16-18; 7:12; 6:13-14; 9:6; 11:3-12; 12:9; 13:15-18; 14; 16:19; 18:3; 18:23; 20:3; 20:4; 20:8-9; 21:1-27; 22:5, 7*,12*,20*; 22:18-19
-
- OR##-L) insert statement
- –
- –
- –
- –
*x
EndofArticle
Personally, I have yet to be swayed by callmecuppy’s arguments. In many cases, I do not agree with his interpretation of Scripture (# see link to list). In others, relying on “recorded history” as “proof” is clearly problematic if we are in Satan’s Little Season. Why? If Satan has already been loosed in order to “deceive the nations”, then there would be little point … if His Son permitted a neon sign over New Jeruselam and a Google map.
Work-in-progress resource hub for those interested in this topic includes:
- x
- x
- x
- x
