Newfoundland RNC Police Report #1
21-FEB-2023
(pre-2017 to present) Court-enabled+ Fraud (Family court)
This NL Police Complaint PDF version || Malicious 2022 NL Crown Charges (until exposed) || 20230401 draft NL Police Complaint #2
A. BACKGROUND
- 20150926 Moore learned that Kiska had been lying to psychiatrists to have her locked up for 6 weeks in 2013 and 8 weeks in 2014.
- 20151001 Moore alerted Kiska that she would be seeking a divorce for cruelty.
- 20151108 Kiska served Moore first and added to his web of lies in all branches of court.
- 20161126 Moore was finally in a financial position to separate from Kiska for the third and final time in November 2016.
B. COURT-ENABLED FRAUD (part 1: 2018)
- Following Moore’s success in receiving permission to amend her Answer to seek damages for Kiska’s multiple crimes and torts in a family court setting[1]—and going broke due to Kiska’s ongoing financial abuse of her and her children—early in 2018, Moore brought a Motion for Interim Financial Support via the Family Law Rules of the Courts of Justice Act—the Act that Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice (Family Branch) uses to circumvent Canada’s Divorce Act.; an Act with federal paramountcy[2] which protects women and children from severe domestic violence.
- Moore’s 20180130 Notice of Motion and initial (brief) Affidavit are included as exhibit D and exhibit E, respectively.
- Moore’s 20180309 second Affidavit is included as exhibit F and the contents of her Factum as exhibit G.
- Containing nothing but errors, omissions and malicious obfuscation—enabled (and commissioned) by his accomplice lawyer Wade Smith of Bell Baker LLP (“Smith”)—Kiska’s 20180318 affidavit, is included as exhibit H.
- In a nutshell, John Kiska (“Kiska”) and his lawyer Wade Smith (“Smith”):
- knowingly lied to the court about Moore’s mental health,
- knowingly lied to the court about Moore’s lack of effort to find employment (evidence available in dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fohotiijopv8dcr/AAAIxGE5Cz0PN8LlHS0NuZxka?dl=0,
- significantly understated Kiska’s income/revenue by ~$100,000 and
- significantly overstated Moore’s income/revenue of $ZERO to ~$95,000.
- Smith’s completely fictional “DivorceMate” calculation, which reduced Kiska’s “income” (i.e. revenue as a self-employed consultant) from ~200,000+ to $100,000 and fabricated an income for Moore out of thin air of $80,000, is included as exhibit I.
- The evidence of Kiska’s and Smith’s defamatory libel and commission of fraud is contained in the 20180322 hearing transcript included as exhibit J.
- The evidence of SCJ’s Justice Julie Audet (“Audet”) enabling these crimes by immediately releasing an endorsement “FOR ORAL REASONS GIVEN” which ignored Moore’s evidence and DENIED her any interim spousal support is included as exhibit K.
- Audet’s next endorsement dated 20180501 followed a series of ridiculous post-hearing exchanges: she ignored not only my previous evidence and testimony; but, my additional correspondence which is partially evidenced by exhibit L.
- On 20180718, the Office of the Children’s Lawyer released the results of their four-moth investigation which recommended to the court that “sole custody of the children should go to the mother”. (See excerpt at exhibit M). <<<<<<
- Moore was solely responsible for caring for the children during their summer holidays of 2018 and Kiska refused to provide meaningful support, share children’s expenses or assist with paying for their children’s required tutoring (see exhibit N)
- Because of the fraudulent results of her Motion for interim support, however, Moore was then forced to sell her well-appointed, three-bedroom bungalow (see exhibit O)—which she, Sean and Cate loved—in September 2018 and rent a townhouse just to be able to survive financially.
- Shortly after the sale of her home, Audet released another order where she:
- reduced the support amount,
- increased Moore’s liability for shared expenses even though her income was zero and
- awarded costs to Kiska.
- Audet’s final 20180907 Interim Support Order of $1,230/month (spousal) and $345/month (both children) with a 50-50 sharing of expenses[3] is included as exhibit P.
- A copy of the 20180417 correspondence (less voluminous exhibits linked at para. 9 b. above) that was submitted to Audet (and fully ignored) is included as exhibit Q.
C. FOR CONTEXT: PARTIAL DESCRIPTION OF OTHER SIMULTANEOUS CRIMES/TORTS
- This coincided with Kiska’s admission to Moore’s parents that he would be “going for the jugular” and “spending his last dollar” [to ruin her]. (see exhibit R)
- One month following Moore’s 20181231 Submission to Engelking which further documented Kiska’s emotional, psychological, psychiatric and financial abuse (see exhibit S) or redacted version under sub-heading 2018 at the Engelking VIS page, the Children’s Aid Society (“CAS”) illegally apprehended Moore’s children from her home, handed them over to Kiska and obtained a restraining order against her.
- Six weeks later, on 20190314 while on her way to a CAS hearing, Moore was arrested and falsely accused of Flight from Peace Officer.
- Denied bail, within the next four weeks:
- Moore’s townhouse was emptied without her knowledge,
- a Not Criminally Responsible opinion was commissioned by a crooked psychiatrist and
- a “final” order designed to remove Moore from her children’s lives forever was granted by another crooked judge, Calum MacLeod (“MacLeod”).
- All signed on 20190408[4], evidence of allegations in para. 23 are included as exhibits T (Eviction Scam), U (French) – V (English) re: unlawful NCR opinion and W [5] (a heavily redacted, illegally-obtained, unlawful, child-abusing 20190408 CYFSA order).
- Moore was acquitted of any wrong-doing by April 30, 2019; but, the damage was done.
- From March to July 2019, both Kiska and the CAS unlawfully denied Moore any communication with or access to her children; despite the requirements of their illegally-obtained 20190408 CYFSA order mentioned at para. 23 c. above.
- On 20190715, just prior to Moore’s long-awaited, scheduled divorce trial, Kiska contacted the CAS Executive Director Kelly Raymond (“Raymond”) and asked for her help in ensuring Moore did not regain shared custody. (See exhibit Z)
- Accordingly, on 20190726, Kiska lied to Ottawa Police Services Board (“OPSB”) by stating that Moore was criminally harassing him, she was schizophrenic and he feared for his safety and that Moore’s daughter Cate wanted her to “stay in Texas (when Moore had never moved to Texas). (Full audio and transcript of Kiska’s 20190726 OPSB interview with Daniel Gervais available upon request or see exhibit AA <<<<)
- Moore was soon thereafter arrested, denied bail and also subject to an illegally-obtained, unlawful, child-abusing, non-communication order. (See exhibit AB)[6]
D. COURT-ENABLED FRAUD (part 2: 2021)
- On 20210124, following a plethora of crimes and torts committed by a plethora of individuals partially evidenced at pfi.rocks/organized-crime/swimlanes, Moore sought leave to bring a Motion to amend the 2018 Interim Support Order in Family court. (See exhibit AC)[7] as permitted pursuant to Courts of Justice Act (“CJA“) FLR Rule XXXX as she continued to battle Kiska and the CAS for her children.
- Instead of a Motion, however, Moore was forced to participate in a bizarre 20210225 Case Conference heard by another crooked judge Pamela MacEachern (“MacEachern”) who:
- refused to recuse herself despite prior bias (i.e. crimes/torts),
- ignored Moore’s evidence,
- lied in her endorsement by stating that the entire family matter had been stayed when only the child custody and access portion had been stayed (see exhibit AJ) following her orchestrated, unlawful 20190727 denial of bail described at paras. 27-29 above and
- denied Moore any justice.
- The conference briefs submitted for the illegally-scheduled 20210225 “Case Conference” (when a Motion with commissioned Affidavits was requested and warranted were:
- Moore’s, included as exhibit AK [8] and
- Kiska’s, included as exhibit AL [9]
- The transcript for that hearing (where Kiska admits he lied to the court in order to receive sole custody and access of the children; where Moore’s details FRO fraud described at footnote #3 below) is included as exhibit AM.
- MacEachern’s 20210609 interlocutory “order”[10] is included as exhibit AN; and, because it was an interlocutory order, Moore was required to seek leave[11] to appeal it instead of simply appealing it.
- Moore’s materials filed to seek leave were:
- Notice of Motion seeking Leave to Appeal (see exhibit AO)
- Factum (see exhibit AP)
- Motion Record (see exhibit AQ)
- Kiska’s Factum and Motion Record are included as exhibits AR and AS, respectively.
- Once Moore realized how many false statements were in Kiska’s materials, she wrote to the court seeking permission to provide evidence of his lies: she was again denied. (see exhibit AT)
E. COURT-ENABLED FRAUD (part 3: 2022)
- On 20220121, the three-judge panel of Matheson[12], Lederer and Copeland, ignored Moore’s evidence of severe domestic violence, child abuse and fraud in order to deny Moore leave without reason and awarded Kiska $5,000 in costs. (see exhibit AU)
F. COURT-ENABLED FRAUD (part 4: 2023)
- In January 2023, Moore received a “hint” (e.g. technology-assisted stalking & harassment: “Leon’s Don’t Pay a Cent Event”) (see exhibit AV) that Kiska would no longer be paying his illegally-obtained, unlawful, below-poverty-level, spousal support of $1,230/month.
- On 20230116, Moore refused to consent to Kiska’s illegally-obtained cost award of $5,000. (see exhibit AW)
- On 20230209, Moore informed Kiska’s lawyers that they were producing more self-incriminating evidencing in the ongoing defrauding of Moore (see exhibit AX) and also alerted Divisional court (see exhibit AY).
- On 20230217, Moore received:
- advice from a Newfoundland-based violence against women counsellor on how to apply for taxpayer-funded welfare and social housing (while Kiska earns ~$200,000/year and squats in her $1,000,000 matrimonial home with her two 100% gaslit teens, her dog and her cat (see exhibit AZ) and
- a certificate for four hours of legal advice from a lawyer associated with their organization (see exhibit BA).
- The illegally-obtained, unlawful $5,000 cost award is expected to be granted on 20230221 between 11:00 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. e.s.t. (see exhibit BB for call in details); accordingly, arrests could be made without a warrant as it will be a CRIME … IN … PROGRESS.
- As of 20230220 14:30 e.s.t., Moore’s e-mail to another of Kiska’s accomplices (Cheryl Hess of Bell Baker LLP) regarding Kiska’s intention to cease paying his measly, illegally-obtained, below-poverty-level spousal support amount of $1,230/month (see exhibit BC) remains unanswered.
G. POLICE & COURT-ENABLED FRAUD?
- If both OPSB and the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary (“RNC”) close this file without further investigation and multiple arrests, then people may begin to realize why Moore labelled the activities of this syndicate Taxpayer-funded Domestic Violence and Child Abuse (“#TDVCA”) in 2019. (See exhibit BD) [13]
H. OTHER POLICE & COURT-ENABLED CRIME
- Much more evidence of this (and other crimes) is listed at Book of Documents #1 for the civil action against two Ottawa-based shysters, Joe Addelman and Gonen Snir: see https://twb.rocks/organized-crime/moore-and-addelman-baum-gilbert-robinson-snir-law-office_cv-22-00089804-0000_book-of-documents_saqotu. [14]
- Evidence of extortion and other crimes committed by/enabled by OPSB is partially available here: https://twb.rocks/organized-crime/vis/michelle-doody with much more under password protection against the CAS and Ottawa’s Office of the Crown Attorney (as required) at www.twb.rocks.
- An online version of this police complaint is available at pfi.rocks/organized-crime/20230221_Police-Complaint_Crime-in-Progress_Court-enabled-Fraud.
I. UPDATE
- On 20230221, after informing registrar Tashekah Gentles of the fraudulent nature of the order in question (and detailing the reasons why), and her obligation pursuant S. 21(1) of the CCC to attempt to put an end to the fraud, she informed me “this is Civil court and has nothing to do with Criminal law”.
- On 20230223, the fraudulently-obtained cost award for Kiska’s benefit was received.
Verily,
Deirdre Moore / Andeé Jak
[1] An excerpt from Moore’s amended Answer is included as exhibit A, an excerpt from the judge’s endorsement is viewable at exhibit B and Moore’s advocacy efforts regarding domestic violence can be gleaned from exhibit C.
[2] In Canadian constitutional law, the doctrine of paramountcy establishes that where there is a conflict between valid provincial and federal laws, the federal law will prevail and the provincial law will be inoperative to the extent that it conflicts with the federal law.
[3] This order was designed to convert Moore from a financial dependent into a revenue source as any nominal income that she may have been in a position to earn would have been simply siphoned away via his ability to spend more on the children than she’d be able to. Their intention was to have this fraudulent order enforced via Ontario’s Financial Responsibility Office … which they attempted to do in 2020 by withholding the nominal monthly payments for six months. Moore recognized this form of fraud immediately and withdrew from the FRO until she could obtain a support award that actually met the legislated requirements instead of the scandalous $1,230/month.
[4] 20190408 > 12,12 > 3,3 > 6: So, three events detrimental to Moore with a “condensed date” of 6 so the sick&twisted sociopaths who run Ottawa can mark the occasion with their “666” like the good little Satanists that they are. Ottawa has been infiltrated with these little beasts: https://thesatanictempleottawa.ca/
[5] However, exhibit W is heavily redacted as posting evidence of MacLeod’s crime has been outlawed via an illegally-obtained 20220524 Probation Order crafted by another crooked judge, Jonathan Brunet (see exhibit X), following years of malicious prosecution by Ottawa’s Crown Attorney’s Office and their accomplices at the OPSB (see exhibit Y)
[6] This order resulted from collusion between Kiska, the CAS, OPSB’s Alex Kirady, Crown’s Mike Boyce and OCJ’s J.P. Paul Harris. (Further evidence available upon request.)
[7] Attachments to this request are included as exhibits (insert link to Pamela MacEachern with link to appeal docs Motion Record Tab 7-redacted)
[8] Attachments to Moore’s Conference Brief included as exhibits AK.1-x (insert link to Pamela MacEachern and add redacted docs)
[9] Attachments to Kiska’s Conference Brief included as exhibits AL.1-x (insert link to Pamela MacEachern and add redacted docs)
[10] Interlocutory orders are orders that are issued by a court while a case is still ongoing. These orders are not meant to be final. They are simply meant to appease a situation within a situation, to resolve an issue temporarily while the case is decided on the whole.
[11] “Leave” is the word that court’s use for “permission”: it’s another way that courts circumvent justice by simply denying leave for no reason and efficiently awarding costs to the perpetrators.
[12] Matheson is also guilty of participating in the denial of my 2021 appeal of the scandalous, illegally-obtained and unlawful CYFSA orders against me—evidence available is under password protection here www.twb.rocks as required.
[13] Note that this syndicate has links to international human targeting and human trafficking as described in Moore’s evidence-laden, voiced-over video available here: https://youtu.be/oWIAxYwVfyQ.
[14] Note that Matheson and his two judicial accomplices responsible for the denial of my CYFSA appeal had all of the documents contained in this list prior to illegally denying Moore’s appeal, as noted at footnote #12 above. The reasons for their decision document their clear involvement in #TDVCA.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
# | DATE | DESCRIPTION | EXHIBIT LINK | FORCED REDACTIONS? | PAGES | RE: PARA# |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 20180111 | A | ||||
02 | 20171116 | B | ||||
03 | 20180825 | C | ||||
04 | 20180130 | D | ||||
05 | 20180130 | E | ||||
06 | 20180309 | F | yes | |||
07 | 20180309 | G | ||||
08 | 20180319 | H | ||||
09 | 20180322 | I | ||||
10 | 20180322 | J | ||||
11 | 20180322 | ENDORSEMENT 1_For Oral Reasons Given_Spousal Support DENIED-AUDET | K | |||
12 | L | |||||
13 | M | |||||
14 | N | |||||
15 | O | |||||
16 | P | |||||
17 | Q | |||||
18 | R | |||||
19 | S | |||||
20 | T | |||||
21 | U | |||||
22 | V | |||||
23 | W | |||||
24 | X | |||||
25 | Y | |||||
26 | Z | |||||
27 | AA | |||||
28 | AB | |||||
29 | AC | |||||
30 | AD | |||||
31 | AE | |||||
32 | AF | |||||
33 | AG | |||||
34 | AH | |||||
35 | AI | |||||
36 | AJ | |||||
37 | AK | |||||
38 | AL | |||||
39 | AM | |||||
40 | AN | |||||
41 | AO | |||||
42 | AP | |||||
43 | AQ | |||||
44 | AR | |||||
45 | AS | |||||
46 | AT | yes | ||||
47 | AU | |||||
48 | AV | |||||
49 | AW | |||||
50 | AX | |||||
51 | AY | |||||
52 | AZ | |||||
53 | BA | |||||
54 | BB | |||||
55 | BC | |||||
55 | BD |