Office of the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner of Canada

The “Urgent” Family Court Notice of Motion || The Vexatious Litigant Racket of Ontario’s Superior Court & Ontario’s Appellant Court Involvement in #TIPCUP || Coming Soon >> The Supreme Court of Canada on Jurisdiction of Child “Custody & Access” for Children of a Marriage in Canada: the FEDERAL Divorce Act vs. PROVINCIAL [so-called Child Protection] Act

page started 20250527 and last updated 20250610 at 12:32 e.s.t.

Thinking of moving to Canada?

[AutoReply] Thank you for contacting the Office of the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner of Canada. Our Office investigates allegations of wrongdoing in the federal public sector, as well as reprisal complaints related to our investigations. Our Office is receiving an unprecedented number of general inquiries. We typically aim to process general inquiries is one working day, and we will respond to your email as expeditiously as possible. In the meantime, you may wish to visit our website for general information: https://www.psic-ispc.gc.ca/en

Note: We do not respond to messages that are not directly sent to our Office (i.e., when in our email address is not in the “To” field) or that contain offensive language.

  • 20250527 10:00 e.s.t. Definition of “Wrongdoing”, “Grounds” & Framework for “Analysis”
    Good day,
    I have been harassed, de-frauded, robbed and persecuted by taxpayer-funded individuals since, at least, February 2019. It not only continues, the severity has increased to the point that I am now in hiding, fearing for my safety, as I continue to publish evidence of their gross civil and criminal actions/inactions. Kindly confirm:
    1. What sort of protection can your organization provide, especially if law enforcement has been complicit?
    2. How does your organization define “wrongdoing”?
    3. What are the specific “grounds” that deem a submission approved for investigation?
    4. What is the analytical framework that is used for investigation?I have evidence against over 400 individuals who are complicit in this network and 10’s of 1000’s of pages of evidence (which increases daily). What format shall I use to present the evidence that supports my allegations?Whistleblower

 

 

Link 1

“What sort of protection can your organization provide, especially if law enforcement has been complicit?”

My e-mail is stored at https://twb.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/20250527-1000-email-to-PSIC-re-Definition-of-Wrongdoing-Grounds-Framework-for-Analysis_SAQOTU_Deirdre-Moore-Andee-Jak.pdf.

Recipients’ work-in-progress VIS pages: n/a

I first learned of and contacted PSIC on 20250527. Regarding my request to understand how I might obtain assistance, there answer has been stored at https://twb.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/20250529-1037-email-from-PSIC-Office-of-the-Public-Sector-Integrity-Commissioner-of-Canada_SAQOTU_Deirdre-Moore-Andee-Jak.pdf.

According to the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act (“PSDPA”), a wrongdoing is defined as one or more of the following:

  1. A contravention of any Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, or of any regulations made under any such Act, other than a contravention of section 19 of the PSDPA;
  2. A misuse of public funds or a public asset;
  3. A gross mismanagement in the public sector;
  4. An act or omission that creates a substantial and specific danger to the life, health or safety of persons, or to the environment, other than a danger that is inherent in the performance of the duties or functions of a public servant;
  5. A serious breach of a code of conduct established under section 5 or 6;
  6. Knowingly directing or counselling a person to commit a wrongdoing set out in any of paragraphs a) to e).

The PSDPA is intended to address wrongdoing that could seriously impact the public’s confidence in the integrity of the public service. It is not intended to address matters of a personal nature, such as individual harassment complaints or individual workplace grievances. These matters should continue to be addressed through procedures available to deal with such concerns.

Well, my file certainly should qualify! However, some of the wording on their site is unclear. I have been attempting to receive clarification regarding my likely eligibility since 20250602; however, they are looking for my phone number while I would prefer a written reply. My questions were very specific:

  1. Does the fact that my knowledge of the wrongdoing is due to personal experience prevent me from receiving assistance from your organization?
  2. Are Crown prosecutors exempt from your scrutiny/oversight?
  3. Are those employed by Ontario’s Ministry of the Attorney General excluded from your scrutiny/oversight?

On 2025006 13:45, I tried again to receive a written response (see https://twb.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/20250606-1345-email-to-PSIC-SECOND-REQUEST-re-Clarification-and-involvement-of-Ministry-of-Attorney-General-in-wrongdoing_SAQOTU_Deirdre-Moore-Andee-Jak.pdf) to my very specific questions.

As of 20250610 12:33, and two requests later, I have received zero response. Interestingly, yesterday I received two texts (one on each of my mobile phones) with some cryptic message allegedly from NYS DMV re: “Final Notice / Enforcement Penalties” at 20250609 13:49. Well, I am not registered with the NYS DMV and one of my phones doesn’t have a SIM card. These texts were received exactly 1 hour and 5 minutes after the e-mail from ECMCC’s legal team arrived (see https://twb.rocks/blank-00/living/safety/ecmcc/thomas-quatroche/hutcheson-affronti-deisinger). Then, at about 22:00 last night a car was parked outside for about 3-4 minutes. I’m sure that was all a coincidence.

12-Jun-16 I left for PSIC a voicemail and I sent another e-mail.

16-Jun-16 I contacted PSIC (again) … and followed up by e-mail (again). It seems like this is just another faux, taxpayer-funded “avenue for remedy” much like the provincial Ombudsmans.

 

Date modified: