Julie Audet

Superior Court of Justice (“SCJ”)

Photograph of Justice Julie Audet from cpdonline.ca post (Twitter @CPDOnlineCanada). She enjoys being paid to de-fraud victims of domestic violence and reward perpetrators.

These things have zero conscious. For work-in-progress information on sociopathy, see https://twb.rocks/understanding-predators/characteristics.

This SCJ Family Court judge commits crime by ignoring legislation and filed evidence; and, relying upon unsubstantiated hearsay that she refers to as “oral reasons given”.

Allegations:

x ² .
x ³ .
x ⁴ .
x ⁵ .
x ⁶ .
x ⁷ .
x ⁸ .
x ⁹ .
x ¹⁰ .

Audet not only enabled Fraud, she committed it herself. She is also guilty of multiple counts of violating s. 126 (ie. Disobeying a Statute). The legislation that she ignored included Canada’s Divorce Act, Canada’s Evidence Act and Ontario’s Courts of Justice Act. By choosing to remain a Party to Kiska’s crimes (pursuant to s. 21(1)), she could also be charged with:

[insert list of Kiska’s crimes committed by September 2018].

She is part of Ottawa’s faux legal-judicial system and contributes to its “busy-ness” and growth as innocent people are terrorized and trafficked³ through the courts (and prisons) so criminals remain protected and financially rewarded.

Imagine my, Sean’s and Cate’s life today if Audet hadn’t been a crooked judge. Alas, my children have been raised by a sociopath since 2019 and denied my love and protection for over six years. Me sending to them a simple birthday card has been criminalized and no one has even bothered to send to me a photograph as their father has enjoyed creating a fiction that has convinced everyone that he is some sort of “victim” while it is me who’s been terrorized for years. See Autumn 2025 Awareness Campaign at https://twb.rocks/about-us/sean-kiska_cate-kiska_children-of-deirdre-moore. ♥️

Here is a link to the pdf version of this testimony/evidence page that you are free to use as you like: (insert link)

FOOTNOTES

¹ Being a party to an offence means that an individual is held criminally responsible for a crime, even if they did not directly commit the illegal act themselves. This legal concept treats those who contributed to the commission of the offence as culpable as the person(s) who physically carried out the illegal act (see s. 21(1)(2) at https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php/Parties_to_an_Offence). This is in addition to other crime that the individual may have committed directly including, but not limited to, s. 465(1)(b) Conspiracy to prosecute (see https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php/Conspiracy_(Offence)) and s. 300/301 Defamatory Libel. ↰

² X. ↰

³ Human trafficking laws in Canada are not limited to exploitation for sex or slave labour (see s. 279.01(1) at https://www.criminalnotebook.ca/index.php/Trafficking_in_Persons_(Offence)). ↰

⁴ X. ↰

⁵ X. ↰

⁶ X. ↰

⁷ X. ↰

⁸ X. ↰

⁹ X. ↰

¹⁰ X. ↰

TO DO: Transfer all of below stored testimony/evidence into new format and update as required:

In a nutshell:

Following a year of financial abuse and legal bullying by ex John Kiska and his then family lawyer, Wade Smith of Bell Baker LLP, I brought a Motion in Family Court (file #FC-15——–) for Interim Financial Support.
Audet ignored my written evidence and oral testimony (see Motion materials that were before the court for this skank’s consideration at bottom of page) to award merely $1,230 in spousal support etc.
(link to Court-enabled Fraud page, link to SCJ Mary Fraser page re illegal CAS award, link SCJ Divisional Court 3-judge panel crooks: J. Perrell, J. Matheson, J. Kristjanson page, link to SCJ Pamela MacEachern Fraud page & second SCJ Divisional crook page)

Article “Tips from Judges who Used to be Family Law Lawyers: Effective Settlement Conferences and Changing Perspectives from Bar to Bench Tax Rules Frustration” by here.

Now:

20230321 I am trying to have members of this syndicate arrested from Newfoundland: I left Ontario for this reason and this reason only. My first complaint is viewable here.

SUMMARY: In reverse chronological order:

post-2018 Family court-enabled fraud? See Tracy Engelking and then Pamela MacEachern.

2019

(Insert evidence of her Audet’s participation in CAS crime as I was falsely accused by John Kiska and denied bail by Crown’s Malcolm Savage &/or co-accomplices.)

2018

Following Moore’s success in receiving permission to amend her Answer to seek damages for Kiska’s multiple crimes and torts in a family court setting[1]—and going broke due to Kiska’s ongoing financial abuse of her and her children—early in 2018, Moore brought a Motion for Interim Financial Support via the Family Law Rules of the Courts of Justice Act—the Act that Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice (Family Branch) uses to circumvent Canada’s Divorce Act.; an Act with federal paramountcy[2]which protects women and children from severe domestic violence.
Moore’s 20180130 Notice of Motion and initial (brief) Affidavit are included as exhibit D and exhibit E, respectively.
Moore’s 20180309 second Affidavit is included as exhibit F and the contents of her Factum as exhibit G.
Containing nothing but errors, omissions and malicious obfuscation—enabled (and commissioned) by his accomplice lawyer Wade Smith of Bell Baker LLP (“Smith”)—Kiska’s 20180318 affidavit, is included as exhibit H.
In a nutshell, John Kiska (“Kiska”) and his lawyer Wade Smith (“Smith”):
1. knowingly lied to the court about Moore’s mental health,
2. knowingly lied to the court about Moore’s lack of effort to find employment (evidence available in dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fohotiijopv8dcr/AAAIxGE5Cz0PN8LlHS0NuZxka?dl=0,
3. significantly understated Kiska’s income/revenue by ~$100,000 and
4. significantly overstated Moore’s income/revenue of $ZERO to ~$95,000.
Smith’s completely fictional “DivorceMate” calculation, which reduced Kiska’s “income” (i.e. revenue as a self-employed consultant) from ~200,000+ to $100,000 and fabricated an income for Moore out of thin air of $80,000, is included as exhibit I.
The evidence of Kiska’s and Smith’s defamatory libel and commission of fraud is contained in the 20180322 hearing transcript included as exhibit J.
The evidence of SCJ’s Justice Julie Audet (“Audet”) enabling these crimes by immediately releasing an endorsement “FOR ORAL REASONS GIVEN” which ignored Moore’s evidence and DENIED her any interim spousal support is included as exhibit K.
Audet’s next endorsement dated 20180501 followed a series of ridiculous post-hearing exchanges: she ignored not only my previous evidence and testimony; but, my additional correspondence which is partially evidenced by exhibit L.
On 20180718, the Office of the Children’s Lawyer released the results of their four-moth investigation which recommended to the court that “sole custody of the children should go to the mother”. (See excerpt at exhibit M). <<<<<<
Moore was solely responsible for caring for the children during their summer holidays of 2018 and Kiska refused to provide meaningful support, share children’s expenses or assist with paying for their children’s required tutoring (see exhibit N)
Because of the fraudulent results of her Motion for interim support, however, Moore was then forced to sell her well-appointed, three-bedroom bungalow (see exhibit O)—which she, Sean and Cate loved—in September 2018 and rent a townhouse just to be able to survive financially.
Shortly after the sale of her home, Audet released another order where she:
1. reduced the support amount,
2. increased Moore’s liability for shared expenses even though her income was zero and
3. awarded costs to Kiska.
Audet’s final 20180907 Interim Support Order of $1,230/month (spousal) and $345/month (both children) with a 50-50 sharing of expenses[3] is included as exhibit P.
A copy of the 20180417 correspondence (less voluminous exhibits linked at para. 9 b. above) that was submitted to Audet (and fully ignored) is included as exhibit Q.
(update & insert link to 2018mmdd Motion Materials and scandalous follow-up communications, crimes and torts)