Ottawa Family Court et al.!*

Bonjour!

It’s been two weeks since I submitted another urgent request to Family Court (see details at https://twb.rocks/archives/y2025/m202506/2025-06-26). If:

• an evidence-based amended Amended Answer,
• the correction of an illegally-obtained fraudulent support order and
• the ending of parental/child alienation

are too complex for a case management conference, we could start with the simple task of addressing the overdue occupational rent (see relevant case law and legislation at https://lamfamilylaw.ca/2024/10/28/from-non-chhom-v-green-to-today-navigating-occupation-rent-claims-in-ontario/).

It should be a slam dunk for any legitimate judge. The relevant factors to be considered when occupation rent is at issue in a family law context are (Non Chhom v. Green, 2023 ONCA 692 (CanLII), at para 9) are:

• the timing of the claim for occupation rent (ie. since 2017, immediately after our third and final separation)
  the duration of the occupancy (ie. 20161201 to present: 8 years, 7 months and 8 days as husband continues to leverage accomplices including, but not limited to, those positioned in Ottawa’s Criminal Court as evidenced at “Party to Offence” published at https://twb.rocks/party-to-offence);
• the inability of the non-resident spouse to realize on their equity in the property (ie. 100% as husband cancelled the BMO Home Equity line of credit and BMO has refused to provide any meaningful records);
• any reasonable credits to be set off against occupation rent (uncertain as the BMO mortgage was renewed behind my back, without my consent); and
• any other competing claims in the litigation (ie. none that have materialized thus far (due to Family Court’s “Delay – Deny – Destroy” tactics) as evidenced by outdated list of damages that I am already permitted to seek at https://twb.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Ex-_A-20180111-Amended-Answer_Excerpt_Damages-Sought-in-Family-court-MOORE.pdf) following the 2017 precedent-setting decision of SCJ’s D. Summers.)

In addition, the following factors have also recently been considered:

• the conduct of the non-occupying spouse, including the failure to pay support (ie. he pays zero as my income remains practically non-existent as evidenced at Notices of Assessment published at https://twb.rocks/domestic-terrorism/perpetrators/individuals/john-kiska/fc-15-2446/2025-urgent-motion);
• the conduct of the occupying spouse, including the failure to pay support (ie. he lied to rip my children from my life (see https://twb.rocks/organized-crime/entity/cas) and lied to have me arrested so the 2019 divorce trial would be cancelled (see evidence linked to https://twb.rocks/domestic-terrorism/perpetrators/individuals/john-kiska at 20190726);

The continued forced impoverishment and destitution of a previously healthy, affluent and devoted mother by an abusive husband not only makes a mockery of Ottawa’s Family Court, but Canada’s federal Divorce Act and its entire legal-judicial/parliamentary process in general. Unless there is a drastic and immediate reversal in the ongoing terrorization and torture of me, it would seem that the time spent amending this Act to codify protections from domestic violence (see Bill C-78 Time Allocation Motion: David Lametti/Arif Virani re-published at item #9 at FC-15-2446 Request to 20240710 Admit #4 at https://twb.rocks/domestic-terrorism/perpetrators/individuals/john-kiska/fc-15-2446/form-22-request-to-admit-20240710) was merely taxpayer-funded theatre; an advertisement for Canada’s public image and nothing more.

Deirdre Moore / Andee Jak
President, SAQOTU Inc.
www.twb.ROCKS/party-to-offence

 

*This e-mail thread as of 202507dd hh:mm is stored at insert link