Form 22 Request to Admit #5

20240828

page started 20240826, last updated 20240826 09:57 e.s.t. || online edits required: change links to twb.rocks (for now)

Request to Admit #1 (2017) || Request to Admit #2 (2018) || Request to Admit #3 (2024) || Request to Admit #4 (2024) || Request to Admit #5 (2024) || John Kiska || Cheryl Hess || FC-15-2446 Continuing Record || FC-19-CP08 Continuing Record || Three Stooges 1 || Three Stooges 2

Family Law Rules

(to do) Describe how to use this Ontario Courts of Justice Act (“CJA“) section of legislation (https://www.canlii.org/en/on/laws/regu/o-reg-114-99/latest/o-reg-114-99.html#sec22subsec2) and the corresponding forms:

to obtain undeniable evidence against pathological liars and their accomplices. Note that pathological lying is a top characteristic of sociopathy (work-in-progress list is viewable at https://twb.rocks/understanding-predators/characteristics) and they literally cannot help themselves. In my opinion, this is due to the fact that sociopaths use most of their resources pretending to have:

  • compassion,
  • empathy,
  • sympathy and
  • other emotions

(ie. human characteristics); so, there is little left for storage capacity (ie. memory). Ergo, they simply cannot remember much and must lie as they have no  other choice.

 

August 28, 2024         (Note that pursuant to Rule 22(4) of above-discussed legislation, if Mr. Kiska does not reply by 20240917, each of the statements 1-x below will have been admitted as truth.)

Dear Jonathan Kiska,

You are requested to admit, only for the purposes of this case[1] , that the following facts are true.

  1. In 2017, I won a precedent-setting Motion in Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice (“SCJ”) that permitted me to seek damages for some of your torts and crimes in a Family Court setting (see Tab 1).
  2. In January 2018, I served and filed my Amended Answer that sought damages for some of your crimes and torts (see Tab 2).
  3. Throughout 2018, you and your Bell Baker LLP lawyer, Wade Smith (“Smith”), committed (among other things) Fraud in Family Court (see Tab 3). 
  4. In July 2018, Katherine Bobula served a report for Ontario’s Office of the Children’s Lawyer that:
    • stated I was the superior parent and
    • recommended on page 19 that sole custody of our children, Sean and Cate, should be awarded to me.

(See Tab 4) 

  1. In 2018, the Ottawa Citizen published my letter to the editor (“(insert title)”) that provided a link to my precedent-setting case law noted at paragraph X above (see Tab 5).
  2. In 2018, you contacted my now-deceased father and informed him that you would be “spending [your] last dollar” and “going for the jugular” during our divorce (see Tab 6).
  3. In 2019, approximately two months before our divorce was to go to trial, you contacted the Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa seeking assistance in how to avoid a shared parenting arrangement.
  4. On 20190726, you provided testimony to Ottawa Police Services’ Daniel Gervais stating that, among other things:
    • x
    • I was [severely mentally ill] and
    • you feared for your safety.
  5. On 20190727, I was:
    • charged with (among other things) the criminal harassment of you (hear evidence at (insert link)),
    • subjected to an Ontario Court of Justice (“OCJ”)-issued Non-communication Order with my children when an SCJ-issued [Communication] Order existed (see Tab X, parts I and II),
    • denied bail by OCJ-appointed Justice of the Peace (“JP”) Paul Harris (“Harris”) and
    • incarcerated at the Ottawa-Carleton Detention Centre (“OCDC”).
  1. On 2019082x, your Bell Baker LLP lawyer Wade Smith (“Smith”) asked former CAS lawyer-now-SCJ-judge Tracy Engelking (“Engelking”) to remove our divorce (FC-15-2446) from the September 2019 trial roster (see Tab X).
  2. On 2019082x, Engelking removed our divorce from the roster and adjusted the quantum awarded for interim financial support (without any formal process whatsoever including, but not limited to, service of any documents on me).
  3. On 2019082x, CAS-positioned lawyer Tara MacDougall stated that “[now that [I] was incarcerated, obtaining sole custody for [you] should be much easier]” (see Tab X).
  4. x
  5. x
  6. x
  7. x
  8. The legal definition of Applicant (or Respondent) is a “person”. A “person” does not include:
    • two people (ie. me and you) or
    • an entity and a person (ie. you and the Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa).

Ergo, the entirety of FC-19-CP08 was … illegal (see evidence-laden Continuing Record at Tab X).

Evidence Tabs

  1. Kiska v. Moore, 2017 ONSC 6872  https://twb.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/000131KJ_20200918_Materials_20200922_Bail-Review-Application_ex-AI-Justice-Darlene-Summers-decision-permitting-damages-Kiska-v.-Moore-2017-ONSC-6872.pdf
  2. 201801dd Amended Answer for FC-15-2446 Kiska v. Moore
  3. x
  4. 20180711 Report of the Children’s Lawyer  https://twb.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Aff-1-ex-_O-2018-Report-from-the-Office-of-the-Childrens-Lawyer.pdf
  5. x
  6. x
  7. x
  8. x
  9. x
  10. x
  11. x
  12. x
  13. x
  14. x
  15. x

Endnotes

[1] notwithstanding section 37(6.1) of Canada’s Evidence Act (ie. effectively, a delete key on the entire piece of legislation (see article outline at https://x.com/CaeJak/status/1827465432481329505/photo/1)

[2] This was done under duress so she could flee Ottawa and seek legitimate law enforcement elsewhere in Canada (see www.pfi.rocks/organized-crime/vis/tina-moores.) 

[3] see www.pfi.rocks/policy-horizons (for now, https://twb.rocks/policy-horizons)

[4] More #pfiROCKS #KaraokeCover is available at www.pfi.ROCKS/Mummygate/rolling-credits (for now, https://twb.ROCKS/Mummygate/rolling-credits)