SUMMARY: In reverse chronological order:

2023

JULY

• 202307xx My reply Affidavit which consists of the EO&MO Analysis of their self-incriminating Affidavits and Factums, FWIW.
• 202307xx  Addelman’s materials:  Affidavit & Factum
• 202307xx  Snir’s materials:  Affidavit & Factum
• 202307xx Affidavit #1 supporting my Motion is a work-in-progress (online version with links to evidence is here) as is my Factum. with an online version linked to evidence here. (Meanwhile, Kemgni‘s long-awaited Statement of Defense arrived 20230703 and OPSB‘s scandalous Affidavit is due to arrive 20230707. And the sociopathic/possessed skanks at Bell Baker LLP and Cavanagh LLP (Victor Vallance Blais LLP)? They no longer reply to e-mails despite ongoing litigation.

JUNE

• 202306xx:  I served TWO revised replies (one for each of the shysters) and a Notice of Motion seeking an Extension in Time:
  • Reply (pdf) to Nelligan Law (Addelman) is here,
  • Reply to Gardiner Roberts (Snir) is here and
  • 202306xx (pdf) Notice of Motion is here; with a reformatted html version here.
  • 202306xx Affidavit of Service for above is here.  

• 202306xx:  I served on Nelligan Law and Gardiner Roberts LLP my pdf Reply: a combined version (here’s the html version with supporting evidence) that addressed the errors (aka lies), omissions and malicious obfuscation intentionally contained within both of their Statements of Defence AND sought consent for late service of same on Gardiner Roberts which, of course, was denied.  

• 202306xx:  Nelligan Law serves the exact same, lame defence that it served back in March: this, despite having evidence of all the lies contained within it (aka Exhibit X of Affidavit #2 which judge LName mysteriously “denied”). 
• 202306xx: LName’s 202306xx decision is released: O’Brien can serve/file a Statement of Defense for some bizarre reason, my Affidavit #2 exhibits are excluded (from what, I have no idea). The exhibits contained the evidence of lies and half-truths contained in their Statements of Defence and Motion Materials as evidenced at 20230531 below.
• 20230608: somehow, O’Brien “wasn’t aware” of my Fresh Statement of Claim and his assistant, Nathan something-Schreuer, was out of the office and unable to confirm. Judge FNameLName limited my arguments to whatever direction she chose and then, at the end of the hearing stated: “well, you didn’t make that argument in your submissions”. In addition to legal bullying by the judge, I was interrupted 2-3 times by “a lawyer” (or, one of O’Brien’s minions waiting for a text from him) who happened into the wrong [virtual] room and required directions. If I weren’t such a good note-taker during O’Brien’s statements of lies, I could have easily lost track. My scribbled notes are here and the 20230608 transcript is here.  

MAY

• 20230531  Documents filed for O’Brien’s 20230608 Motion to Set Aside Default are:
  • 20230404  Nelligan Law’s Motion Record containing Notice of Motion, Affidavit and Draft Order
  • My Affidavit #1 with exhibits A-AF, Affidavit #2 with exhibits A-K and a Factum (all of which is self-contained in a separate html page here.)

• 20230509  I wasn’t permitted to submit any documents for this “Conference”: apparently nothing can be scheduled in court anymore as it must be done via Canderly. Here is Associate Justice Fortier’s 20230509 endorsement … which I received 20230511. As there is no point in attempting to have a Summary Judgment Motion by the racket that is 161 Elgin (as O’Brien will simply ask for an adjournment until after his Motion to have their default set aside is heard), I’ll simply argue why their Motion should be denied on June 8th and document whatever nonsense comes out of that hearing.  
• 20230420-26  Good grief. I was forced to request a hearing to have my request for a partial Summary Judgment considered. What. A. Racket. A request to seek leave to appeal a massive, fraudulent SCJ decision can be heard in writing but not this simple matter. This ordeal is being documented as the Case Management Conference Request.
• 202304xx  O’Brien threatened by e-mail to have my Notice of Default set aside with costs payable immediately if I did not acquiesce to his desire to Disobey a Statute; namely, the Courts of Justice Act’s Rules of Civil Procedure (a violation of S. 126 of the Criminal Code of Canada.) As I don’t respond threats and extortion, he served and filed his motion materials and immediately received a date of yyyymmdd to be heard (without any request of my availability whatsoever … as if my schedule were completely irrelevant.)
• 20230401  I re-filed my Request in a manner that lacked a mountain of evidence but only cost me the regular filing fee of $177 + tax. Here is my Request for Summary Judgment not yet being considered by SCJ (and hopefully not by lead Civil judge Sally Gomery who already recused herself in one of my cases, see details on page of another crooked judge, Ryan Bell … following her scandalous performance on the Victor Vallance Blais Rule 21 Motion). The file was rejected. I wonder if I got a refund.
• 20230331  I attempted to file my Requisition for a Default Judgment pursuant to Rule 19(….) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. However:
  • the system requires full payment prior to consideration of the Fee Waiver Request
  • the system’s filing fee was 400% higher than the cost as it could not handle a document that was so evidence-laden that it needed to be scanned via four bundles.
  • the courthouse staff had zero solution for this technology-related denial of justice.
• 2023mmdd  O’Brien committed the crime of extortion (S. XXX of the CCC) and his co-accomplice, Nathan LName committed two counts of Disobey a Statute (S. 126 of the CCC) by violating Rules X and Y of the Rules in the CJA.
• 2023mmdd  Following x days of this nonsense, I noted them in default as permitted via Rule XX
• 2022mmdd  Prior to fleeing Ottawa in August 2022 (see details at >> replace links!!  >>  Criminal Justice, NL-style) and  Police Extortion), I issued a Statement of Claim against Two Ottawa Shysters), Joe Addelman and Gonen Snir.