#Mummygate, the Darkumentary || Soundtrack || Rolling Credits || Outtakes || Cast || Producers || Directors || #Mummygate. the Screenplay
This is just a work-in-progress draft of my $50M Civil Action against Doug Downey’s Ministry, framed as a screenplay (for now). I’m not permitted to initiate the actual claim until 60 days following my service of Notice, which was done on 20231101 at 3:20 p.m. with a five-page e-mail that evidenced my whistle-blowing site with a cover and back page.
It’ll be a race, I’m sure, to see who gets to land the file #CV-24-00000001! Can’t for your mug shot, you little weasel.
Ontario Minister of the Attorney General, Doug Downey: taxpayer-funded harbourer of organized crime.
#ThrowAwayTheKey
Page last updated 20231109 10:05 e.s.t. (most recent e-mail to the Ministry with beyond a reasonable doubt for 186.75 hours … & counting.
Logline: A devoted mum attempts to divorce a sociopath linked to a massive, government-enabled, crime syndicate and finds the dark humour in their satanic errors, omissions and malicious obfuscation. DRAFT SCENE TITLES The Treatment? 👇
How to write a screenplay tips Actual Filed/Served 202310xx Statement of Claim Books of Documents: #1 #2 #3 #
CV-24-000xxxxx-0000
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
b e t w e e n
Deirdre Moore (plaintiff)
and
His Majesty the King in right of Ontario (defendant)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM for $50,000,000 plus costs
(link to court-enabled fraud as this Civil Action progresses)
DEAREST Ministry of the Attorney General
A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED AGAINST YOU by the plaintiff. The claim made against you is set out in the following pages.
IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, you or an Ontario lawyer acting for you must prepare a statement of defence in Form 18A prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it on the plaintiff’s lawyer or, where the plaintiff does not have a lawyer, serve it on the plaintiff, and file it, with proof of service in this court office, WITHIN TWENTY DAYS after this statement of claim is served on you, if you are served in Ontario.
If you are served in another province or territory of Canada or in the United States of America, the period for serving and filing your statement of defence is forty days. If you are served outside Canada and the United States of America, the period is sixty days.
Instead of serving and filing a statement of defence, you may serve and file a notice of intent to defend in Form 18B prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure. This will entitle you to ten more days within which to serve and file your statement of defence.
IF YOU FAIL TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, JUDGMENT MAY BE GIVEN AGAINST YOU IN YOUR ABSENCE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU. IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING BUT ARE UNABLE TO PAY LEGAL FEES, LEGAL AID MAY BE AVAILABLE TO YOU BY CONTACTING A LOCAL LEGAL AID OFFICE.
IF YOU PAY THE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM, and $2,500.00 for costs, within the time for serving and filing your statement of defence you may move to have this proceeding dismissed by the court. If you believe the amount claimed for costs is excessive, you may pay the plaintiff’s claim and $400 for costs and have the costs assessed by the court.
TAKE NOTICE: THIS ACTION WILL AUTOMATICALLY BE DISMISSED if it has not been set down for trial or terminated by any means within five years after the action was commenced unless otherwise ordered by the court.
Date …..October xx, 2023……………… Issued by ……...insert illegible signature……………………
Local registrar
Address of ….insert address………………………
Court Office ….insert city Courthouse…………………
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
TEASER
- The plaintiff claims:
- $50,000,000* in pecuniary damages due to [pick a tort, any tort] which caused [pick a damage, any damage] and/or but for the commission of crime including, but not limited to:
- perjury, fraud, theft, ….
- torture, trafficking and terrorist activities
- $50,000,000* in pecuniary damages due to [pick a tort, any tort] which caused [pick a damage, any damage] and/or but for the commission of crime including, but not limited to:
by individuals enabled by Doug Downey’s Ministry of the Attorney General “Downey HQ”) including, but not limited to those at:
-
-
- Ottawa’s Crown Attorney’s Office (“OCA”),
- the Office of the Children’s Lawyer (“OCL”),
- the Office of the Independent Police Review Directorate (“OIPRD”) and
- Ontario’s Public Guardian and Trustee (“OPGT”),
-
the plaintiff (“Jak”) would not have been forced to endure the hardships detailed at (insert Karaoke Cover lyrics of Rascall Flatt’s Backwards) by the Syndicate and their “protection” of covert, malignant narcissist and/or demon-controlled John Kiska (“Kiska”);
-
- other damages that the Court deems to be fair and just and
- costs on a full-indemnity basis.
*Or, an amount that will force them to file cross-claims against the entities and individuals who perpetuate taxpayer-funded organized crime, whichever is greater.
TRAILER
- The 20000722 marriage between Jak and Kiska began to unravel by 2012 and the entire month of February 2013 was spent arguing, mostly via e-mail, over:
- promises broken,
- lifestyle choices regarding their perfect children, Sean Charles Kiska d.o.b. 20060508 and Cate Stella Kiska d.o.b. 20061130 (“Sean & Cate“) and
- completely irresponsible estate planning.
- Then, the Syndicate pulled the “Dispose of the Wife” switch:
- Step 1: OCDSB, CAS, OPSB & TOH
- Step 2: Bell Baker LLP and Victor Vallance Blais LLP
- Step 3: Audet, Engelking and the OCL
- TO DO: Wyzynski, Munro, Saul, Henry, Anderson, Atkinson, Moore1, Charbonneau, Moore2
- TO DO: Smith, Hammond, Blais, Lalonde, “mediator” Davies,
- With the assistance of Smith and Audet, Kiska was able to commit fraud in Family court: he obtained a below-poverty-level, interim support order with equal sharing of children’s expenses (see details of how this was to convert Moore from a support recipient into a revenue stream for Kiska via MCCSS’s FRO: subplot “Let’s milk her into suicide” at para. X below).
- Soon after the 20180711 OCL report of clinician Katherine Bobula (“Bobula”) was released, three key events occurred:
- on 20180825 the Ottawa Citizen published Moore’s 20180818 Letter to the Editor,
- by 20180905 Moore was forced to sell her three-bedroom bungalow and move children for the third time in under two years and
- Kiska informed Moore’s parents that he would be “going for the jugular” and “spending his last dollar” [to ruin her].
- Regardless, Moore submitted her “20181231 Submission to Engelking” which evidenced Kiska’s verbal, emotional, psychological and psychiatric abuse and/or cover-up of same. Then, all hell broke lose:
- Act I: Attempted Demonization – scenes 1-3
- Act II: Attempted Criminalization – scenes 1-x
- Act III: Attempted Marginalization – scenes 1-x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
❤️ ACT I – The Demonization ❤️
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Act I: Scene 1 The CAS Switcheroo
- Early in 2019, Jak hand-delivered the “2018 Submission to Engelking” to CAS’s Viana Ibrahim: within a couple of weeks, the file was transferred to Mohammed Said who acknowledged receiving the file but not reading in it.
- By 20190201, Sean & Cate were illegally ripped from Jak’s living room and delivered to Kiska by Said with the assistance of three OPSB officers & she’s been fighting for them ever since.
(Insert flashback scene (paras. x-y of Chronology of Events); or, just do a prequel as the 2013-2018 nightmare is a screenplay unto itself.)
Act I: Scene 2 Gangstalking 101: The Justice Department, GSI-mal and the Chateau Laurier
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Act I: Scene 3 Six Weeks of Insanity
- On 20190314, en route to a CAS hearing, Jak was arrested, released and re-arrested by an RCMP officer intent on having her charged with “Flight from Peace Officer” even though she was merely looking for a safe place to pull over,
- Following several brutal stomp to her ribs (and head), Jak thought that her ribs were broken; so, when she arrived at Leclerc Laval, she asked to be taken to a hospital for x-rays.
- Instead of x-rays, the doctor simply re-interviewed her over and over until she changed her story from being beaten by a QPP officer into “hurting her ribs by tripping into a garbage can at a gas station”. 🙄
- On 20190317, Jak was forced by the court to undergo a fitness to stand trial assessment: she was sent to Suroît Hospital and assigned to a barely-speaks-English Dr. Paule Kemgni who held her for 21-days so Kiska and his Syndicate could:
- empty her 3-bedroom townhouse without her knowledge and
- illegally obtain an unlawful, CYFSA 20190408 sole custody and access order from SCJ’s Justice Calum McLeod.
- On 20190408, Kemgni also signed off on a Not Criminally Responsible opinion (French version, English translation: based entirely on the hearsay of Kiska and his now deceased companion sister) even though Jak never committed any crime in the first place.
- On 20190409, Justice Joey Dubois ignored Kemgni’s bogus NCR opinion and Jak was returned to Leclerc Laval to prepare for her trial: there, she learned that it was just as much of a disaster as the Suroît Hospital.
- On 20190428, Jak defended herself, received a full acquittal and was released (albeit without her 2019 journals/notes and some of her nicer clothes.
- On 20190502, bewildered by whatever the heck was going on in Canada, Jak fled to the U.S. and found herself attending Jack White’s convocation in Detroit: she was shocked to see some of the dissertations that were passing for doctorates of philosophy at Wayne State University and placed “find out more about the [insert noun] that is psychiatry on her to-do list.
- So, after a couple of days buying presents for Sean and Cate in El Paso, Mexico, Jak decided to … by:
- building out an online platform, pfi.ROCKS, for victims of narcissistic abuse,
- developing an Introspection-based Therapy kit and
- setting up a booth at the American Psychiatric Association’s 2019 Annual Meeting in San Francisco (see 20191107 Reply to Savage Tab 14 pages 1-9).
❤️ ACT II – The Criminalization ❤️
This act evidences the weaponization of the OPSB, the OCA, the OCJ and the criminal division of the SCJ (as well as the OPGT and the OCL) in order to secure a favaourable outcome for an abusive spouse: scenes are entitled: “If you can’t beat her, jail her!”; “Break & Enter (aka extortion by the Crown)”, “Muting-by-Amicus”, “Pimp-managed Bail House Rocked!”, “Coward at John Howard and “Andeé At Large!”; “pfi.ROCKS rolls, more torture by Kiska’s flying monkeys & the beginning of the cover-up”.
Act II: Scene 1 “If you can’t beat her, jail her!”
- x
- x
- x
- So, after the scandalous performances of OPSBs Alex Kirady, Daniel Gervais and Jean Benoit; OCA’s Mike Boyce and OCJ’s JP Paul Harris, Jak again found herself behind bars–this time, prevented from communicating with Sean & Cate using any means whatsoever via a 20190727 Non-communication Order!
- (Note that Kiska’s CAS-positioned accomplices wasted no time to start celebrating her detention and moving forward with their plans for 100% parental and child alienation in order to protect Kiska and destroy Andeé and Sean & Cate who, to this day, believe that they were abandoned by their mum.)
- Not yet aware that the entire system was a complete racket (and fortunate to have been defrauded so much that she abandoned credit cards was arrested with a significant amount of cash, the only way to purchase canteen items), she began her mail campaign. The documents sent are viewable at 2019 Mail Campaign and Jak also recorded the recipients via a Tracking Sheet.
- Noteworthy, among other materials, was the 20190814 54-page fax sent to both the OCA and the CAS which included document:
- (l) Form 33B.1 Answer
- (m) Overview of offences committed to obtain Calum MacLeod’s 20190408 CYFSA Order
- (n) Up-to-date Summary
- (o) Disclosure: Gervais-Kiska Notes
- (j) 20190812 2-page letter to Crown
- (p) Hand-written copy of Calum MacLeod’s unlawful 20190408 CYFSA Order
- (q) Smith’s post-arranged-arrest 20190806 letter to Engelking
- (r) Engelking’s 20190809 endorsement.
Convert to a note: the fax confirmations are here.
There is a problem, clearly, when the CAS and the OPSB and the OCA and the SCJ can all be weaponized by an abusive spouse during a high-conflict divorce. But for the OCL and the OPGT to be weaponized too? (see paras x-y and x-y below) We may as well give the entire Ministry of the Attorney General their pink slips and just .. start .. over.
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Act II: Scene 2 “Sure, I’ll plead: not guilty!”
- x
- x
- x
- 20190815 John Ramsay chose to attempt to extort Jak into pleading guilty to a charge of Break and Enter … on her own house … where she stole nothing … and had zero criminal intent.
- As evidenced in the 20190815 transcript, Jak was having none of that. (Add note re: how Savage dropped this charge in 2021 in exchange for a ruling that Jak remain in SCJ. [Why? to reduce opportunity to appeal? Or, to keep his bogus 20210505 NCR Opinion relevant? My $20 goes solidly on his pal Watts’ NCR. Please fire & incarcerate both of their asses too.]
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Act II: Scene 3 “Muting by Amicus or lawyer (+ doctor): your choice”
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- Elvis Presley’s “Jail House Rock” (with a Karaoke cover)
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Act II: Scene 4 “Every taxi driver ’round the block, knows the E-Fry Bail House Rocks!”
- x
- x
- x
- Puzzle for prisoners #35 Why did the Bail House Manager need so many Bandages?
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Knowing that I would simply be falsely accused and re-arrested upon return, I remained out of Canada for as long as I could afford so I could upload enough evidence against Ottawa’s court-enabled crime syndicate as possible. I lived in Mexico for two months and as well as Alaska for two months. Evidence of my whistle-blowing activities (mixed with a little dark humour) is available at https://twb.rocks/enterprise_archives_202008/ etc. ( username: MooresTeam & password: #SlashTheirBudget! )
It was in Alaska that I learned of how IP Addresses were used to label targets (as well as organize communications within their terrorist cell networks) by spending two weeks on a pfi.ROCKS! Visitor Analysis. (See twb.rocks 20200812 Archives for this & more!)
It was in Alaska that I started to put more pieces together on an old school chum: Kevin Haggerty.
Act II: Scene 5 “Coward at John Howard: Andeé’s At Large!”
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Act II: Scene 6 “As pfi.ROCKS from Mexico: memories for Sean & Cate”
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Act II: Scene 7 “[Manresa Spirituality Centre, Christie Pits & the tie to International Trafficking”
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
❤️ ACT III – The Marginalization ❤️
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Act III: Scene 1 “A Bail Review? Not on your life!”
- Once Jak returned to Canada, and dealt with both Snir and the CAS, she turned her attention to the Crown and their sadistic 20190727 Non-Communication Order.
- x
- Jak filed her served and filed her Application for a Bail Review that was, again, rife with evidence against so-called “complainant” Kiska:
- Application
- Ex A
- x
- x
- Within XX hours, Jak was re-arrested on the bogus breach allegation that was converted into a warrant for her arrest on 20200331.
- In custody, when she advised [some judge] of her scheduled hearing, [some judge] relayed [some bs].
Act III: Scene 2 “You can call me Cedric”
- x
- x
- x
- This was the first clear piece of evidence that Brunet was a crooked judge.
- (Funny how nobody but nobody wants Jak to get her hands on a copy of the complete, unredacted CAS files which she’s had a right to obtain all along. Certainly, it will be a cold day in Hell before the demon Brian Fisher of any of Kiska’s other accomplices agree to provide the Third-party Records that would be help to evidence the entire, taxpayer-funded, court-enabled crime syndicate.
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Act III: Scene 3 “Bail? Not if I can help it!”
- In this scene, Crown prosecutor Mike Boyce returns as the chief antagonist. Plan A? Ensure Jak is not released on bail. Plan B? If she is, grab what he can as far as conditions go:
- steal her passport,
- force her to live in slum-lord addict/hooker housing and
- force upon her a GPS-monitored curfew;
all designed to keep Jak as restricted (and broke, and hopeless) as possible and evidenced by her 20201013 Release Order. (Note that as of 20231103, no one has returned to Jak her passport and, again dependent on Ontario Works as Kiska’s accomplice Cheryl Hess continues to assist him with his never-ending Fraud, she cannot afford to apply for a new one.)
- x
- x
- Running out of an ability to pay for said court-ordered, GPS-monitoring ankle bracelet, on 20210108, Jak was forced to start a small claim against Kiska to attempt to obtain her fraudulently-obtained, below-poverty-level, court-ordered spousal support.
- For some reason, he decided to pay it until 202301dd when he chose to stop again and Jak received another TASH message: a Leon’s “Don’t Pay A Cent Event” e-mail. (Note that sociopaths have the emotional maturity of an 8 year old: see #7.)
- x
- x
- x
Act III: Scene 4 “The Smoking Gun”
- In this scene, we have Malcolm Savage, again, ignoring a mountain of exculpatory evidence; however, this time he also incriminates two judges. Enter stage right: Norman Boxall and Jonathan Brunet and their collective IBD*ing of evidence served and filed for a two purposes, a Bail Review (so I could, at a minimun contact Sean & Cate so they could finally learn the truth) and a Third-party Records Application (so I could fully defend myself against their 14 bogus charges). The documents served were: Additional Materials re: 21-DV6967 & 19-RD18130 (body)
-
- Parental alienation of accused
- Malicious prosecution of accused
- Credibility of Kiska (complainant)
- EO&MO of Kiska Affidavit
- CAS remains Willfully Blind
- CAS violates CYFSA
- Due to the volume of evidence that will be filmed during this scene, a separate page is require: see “The Smoking Gun”.
IBD = Ignore, Bury &/or Discount-to-a-value-of-zero; a term first coined to use in Civil Action File #23-CV-00061855 against the Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa
Soundtrack
- Bang-Bang
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Act III: Scene 5 (insert scene name)
- x
- On 20210707, defense attorney Alyssa Jervis (“Jervis”) details to MAGA-Crown her position on all of Andeé’s charges. Not surprisingly, these statement were similar to those made by Andeé nearly two years previously in her letters to the Crown as Andeé is not a freaking idiot.
- Instead of going to trial as she wanted, Jervis convinced Jak to:
- “agree to one charge, any charge” in exchange for a conditional discharge and
- prepare a “Pre-sentencing package” (“PSP”) because she will argue for an absolute discharge.
Should that fail, moving to another jurisdiction would enable her to seek its early termination via an Application for “Compassionate Release”.
- (As of 20231024, it is unconfirmed whether or not the 20220mdd PSP was served on or received by anyone as Ottawa Criminal, MAGA-Crown and Jervis refuse to answer that question.)
- By 202309xx NL landlady Shelene Crawley chooses to steal my few remaining dollars and the RNC refuses to investigate.
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Act III: Scene 6 “No more evidence for you!”
- Again, Jak attempted to obtain Third-party Records to evidence, at a minimum, her innocence and Kiska’s guilt. (Note that as of 20231103, the Syndicate is still preventing her from obtaining this evidence:
- OPSB/BLG/ROMHC/Ottawa has thus far obfuscated her efforts via their vexatious, vexatious Application,
- McCarthy Tétrault LLP is simply pretending they’re not important and attempting to exclude them from their bogus, pre-civil defense “investigation”,
- CAS’s career criminal Brian Fisher is obviously refusing as Jak intends to sue them into bankruptcy (as they most definitely deserve) and
- neither Bell Baker LLP’s Cheryl Hess nor Ottawa’s Family court clerks will even return an e-mail on next steps toward a divorce trial.
Also note that all that was required for Jak to have FOUR criminal charges dropped in NL was to file a S. 699 Third-party Records Application that merely hinted at the torture she had been enduring in Ontario for years.
- x
- This was the first clear piece of evidence that Brunet was a crooked judge.
- (Funny how nobody but nobody wants Jak to get her hands on a copy of the complete, unredacted CAS files which she’s had a right to obtain all along. Certainly, it will be a cold day in Hell before the demon Brian Fisher of any of Kiska’s other accomplices agree to provide the Third-party Records that would be help to evidence the entire, taxpayer-funded, court-enabled crime syndicate.
- x
- x
- x
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Act III: FINAL Scene 202ymmdd
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- On 20231018, Jak sent another e-mail to Ottawa Criminal and MAGA-Crown regarding the receipt of Jak’s 2022 “pre-sentencing” package (see page 3, para. 2)x
- On 20231023, Jak sent another e-mail to Ottawa Criminal and MAGA-Crown regarding the scope (and the date) of her Application to deal with the illegally-obtained, unlawful, 3-year 20220524 Probation Order:
- following nearly three years of torture summarized in this 20210409 Release Order; and,
- utilized simply to extort Jak into moving her evidence-laden, whistle-blowing site to a password-protected, out of public view site https://twb.rocks/ with user name MooresTeam and password #SlashTheirBudget!).
- x
- 20231025 Me, an experienced business analyst .. still at the United Way-funded, YMCA “Shelter” .. in Niagara Falls (aka, not a SAF govvie town) .. receiving Ontario Works .. working on our next Karaoke Cover entitled “?”.
- x20231024: R. H. v. Ontario (Ministry of the Attorney General), 2002 CanLII 2835 (ON SC) describes test for malicious prosecution as:
- (a) the criminal proceeding must have been initiated by the defendant. ✔️
- (b) the criminal proceeding was terminated in favour of the plaintiff. ✔️
- (c) the proceeding was instituted without reasonable cause. ✔️
- (d) the defendant was actuated by malice, which for intents and purposes is the requirement of an improper purpose. ✔️
- Abuse of Authority[32] In order to demonstrate abuse of authority, the plaintiffs must plead the following:1. that the public officer deliberately acted unlawfully, that is in bad faith and with an improper motive;2. that the officer was aware that the conduct was unlawful and likely to injure the plaintiff;3. the injuries suffered were otherwise compensable in tort; and4. that the tortuous conduct was the legal cause of the plaintiff’s injuries. (See Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69 at para. 32
- As of 20231030, there has been no response regarding the receipt of “Pre-sentencing Package” prepared for the the 20220524 hearing from anyone; accordingly, I am prevented from fully defending myself against OPSB vexatious, vexatious Application being published here: https://twb.rocks/the-darkumentary
Soundtrack
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
- x
Final Paragraph for Statement of Claim
CV-23-000xxxxx-0000
- In closing, because of the actions and inactions of the MAG-positioned entities and/or individuals described at paras. x-y, x-y, x-y etc., Jak has …. Specifically,
- a) x
- b) x
- c) x
- d) x
- e) x
January 2, 2024
(began 20231023 & last updated 20231108 at 15:20) |
Deirdre Moore, (insert address)
(613) 848-6832
|
Act x Scene y: SUBPLOT 1 > She’s Bad (Quebec’s RCMP, Patrick Cardinal, Leclerc Laval & crooked psychiatrist #1 & Calum MacLeod)
Act x Scene y: SUBPLOT 1 > She’s Bad (Addelman, Aitken & ROMHC’s crooked Zeynep Selaman & Joel Watts)
Act x Scene y: SUBPLOT 1 > She’s Bad (MHCC)
Act x Scene y: SUBPLOT 1 > She’s Bad (APA Annual Conference)
Beyond-a-reasonable-doubt guilt of the CAS, the OCL, Bell Baker LLP … & SCJ’s Divisional court
“In her pursuit of access to justice, she is impeded by her mental illness and a costs award against an impecunious, homeless and impeded litigant is not in the interests of justice and would just be cold-hearted, meaningless, and just mean.”
add The Prequel for the MCCSS
Endnotes
1 Dr. Paule Kemgni, Dr. Zeynep Selaman, Dr. Benoit Dassylva
2Insert other notes