twb.ROCKS Evidence!

SCJ-enabled Organized Crime Continues without Remorse¹

1. On 20230824, my materials were again ignored by both the Applicant (“OPSB”) and the Superior Court of Justice (“SCJ”) which chose to ignore:
   • a) my testimony (see 20230821 Factum at Exhibit C) and
   • b) my evidence (see 20230719-20230817 Affidavits #1-#5 with, collectively, 47 exhibits (“The Affidavits”).
2. Instead of granting any of the relief requested in my 20230803 Notice of Motion for that hearing (see Exhibit D), Justice Sylvia Corthorn (“Corthorn”):
   • a) refused to recuse herself despite my request and reasons that on 20230608 she:
     • i. restricted my oral arguments to responding to opposing counsel’s arguments only,
     • ii. used the fact that I did not (ie. was not permitted to) make a complete submission … against me as some sort of deficiency in argument,
   • b) ruled in favour of career criminals Joe Addelman and Gonen Snir (“Two Shysters”) and
   • c) chose to discount all of my evidence submitted for the hearing simply because it was hyperlinked to my Affidavits instead of to a Motion Record; even though she had Rule 2.01 at her disposal which states that:

     “(1) A failure to comply with these rules is an irregularity and does not render a proceeding or a step, document or order in a proceeding a nullity, and the court,

     • • a) may grant all necessary amendments or other relief, on such terms as are just, to secure the just determination of the real matters in dispute; or
       • (b) only where and as necessary in the interest of justice, may set aside the proceeding or a step, document or order in the proceeding in whole or in part. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 2.01 (1).”

     (See Corthorn’s 20230620 endorsement at 20230803 Affidavit #2, Ex B, pages 40-62/1970, paras. [21]-[24], repectively, and 20230608 transcript at Exhibit E)

3. In fact, Corthorn stated that her endoresement would force me to bring a Case Management Conference to be heard in front of the same biased judge who produced the scandalous vexatious Application in the first instance, associate judge Marie T. Fortier (“Fortier”) (see Corthorn’s 2023mmdd endorsement at Exhibit F).
4. Corthorn knew, or ought to have known:
   • a) she had the jurisdiction to change the terms of the vexatious Application schedule as she is higher in the SCJ “pecking order” than Fortier,
   • b) the urgency with which, among other things, my request for a virtual cross examination was made given my dire financial situation and the fact that I fled Ontario for Newfoundland and Labrador (“NL”) in 2022 and was remaining in NL for safety reasons and
   • c) OPSB’s entire vexatious Application should be dismissed immediately as permitted pursuant to Rule 2.1.01 (1) which states that “the court may, on its own initiative, stay or dismiss a proceeding if the proceeding appears on its face to be frivolous or vexatious or otherwise an abuse of the process of the court. Reg. 43/14, s. 1.
5. Instead, Corthorn chose to employ Rule 50.13 (1): “a judge may at any time, on his or her own initiative or at a party’s request, direct that a case conference be held before a judge or associate judge”. Reg. 170/14, s. 16; O. Reg. 383/21, s. 15.
6. On 20230824, I felt I had no choice but to continue to be tortured, trafficked and terrorized by team OPSB-SCJ for their collective pleasure and profit as I enter my eleventh year attempting to get a divorce and rescue my children, Sean & Cate, from their heavily-police/Crown/court-protected, sociopathic father: John Kiska (see The Affidavits): my extorted request for a Case Management Conference is viewable at Exhibit G. which renders me complicit in the ongoing de-frauding of Ottawa, Ontario and Canadian taxpayers by team OPSB-SCJ.
7. Corthorn also refused to grant leave to revise my Statement of Claim against OPSB who is simultaneously:

3. • a) refusing to investigate the Fraud complaint opened by the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary RNC #23-12441/OPS#23-161630 against Kiska (see 20230719 Affidavit #1, Ex B, pages 895-904/930) by deeming in “a Civil matter” and
   • b) attempting to have me denied access to justice in any court by maliciously having me declared vexatious (see 20230719 Affidavit #1, Ex A, pages 871-887/930)

to perpetuate the court-enabled Fraud that began via Justice Julie Audet and Bell Baker LLP’s Wade Smith in 2018.

The Purpose of this Motion

8. This Motion seeks the recusal of multiple judiciary officials because, on YYYYMMDD, Fortier lied when she refused to recuse herself; claiming that a request for recusal had to be done via Motion … with evidence (see transcript of 20230608 hearing at Exhibit E and resulting 20230512 endorsement that:
   • a) favoured both OPSB and Two Shysters and
   • b) forced me to bring a Motion

            at Exhibit H²).

9. It also sought additional relief which was effectively denied by Corthorn on 20230824 as described at paras. 1-7, above.
10. Finally, it seeks a pre-judgment award—justified by all the evidence already in team OPSB-SCJ’s possession—as well as costs.

Solution for team OPSB-SCJ was long-ago provided

11. OPSB could simply settle with me and re-coup costs from a couple of the perpetrators listed at 20230804 Affidavit #3, Exhibit A; instead, they are so focused on the obliteration of me that they’ll lose everything they pretend is dear to them (see WHO/UN article at Exhibit I, also viewable at https://twb.rocks/living/exposure/000668-are-they-really-using-schools-to-sexualize-children with links to even more reality that seems currently beyond the cognitive grasp of the parties involved in Mummygate).
12. That the level 1-3 sociopaths are currently being used by the level 4-5 sociopaths to build their own prisons, however, is the least of their concerns. #1800CallAnExorcist

¹ This is a symptom of sociopathy, or so-called Anti-social Personality Disorder, as described in Affidavit #5, Exhibit A. It is my view that sociopaths are screened into both the legal and the medical professions via the LSATs and the MCATs, respectively (see exhibit A). It is for this reason that that the former enables crime and the latter enables death/disability via lethal/toxic injection (see exhibit B).

² It is for this reason that the online version of this Affidavit #6 is entitled: “Pinball Wizard: Attorney General of Canada, David Lametti”.

 

Characteristics of Sociopathy

1. Antisocial Personality Disorder (“APD”) is a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (“DSM-5”), diagnosis assigned to individuals who habitually and pervasively disregard or violate the rights and considerations of others without remorse.
2. People with APD may:
   • a) be habitual criminals, or engage in behavior which would be grounds for criminal arrest and prosecution, or
   • b) they may engage in behaviors which skirt the edges of the law, or manipulate and hurt others in non-criminal ways which are widely regarded as unethical, immoral, irresponsible, or in violation of social norms and expectations.
3. Those with APD often possess an impaired moral conscience and make decisions driven purely by their own desires without considering the needs or negative effects of their actions on others.
4. Impulsive and criminal behavior is common: the terms psychopathy or sociopathy are also used, in some contexts synonymously, in others, sociopath is differentiated from a psychopath, in that a sociopathy is rooted in environmental causes, while psychopathy is genetically based.
5. Symptoms displayed by those with APD include:
   • a) failure to obey laws and norms by engaging in behavior which results in criminal arrest, or would warrant criminal arrest;
   • b) lying, deception, and manipulation, for profit or self-amusement;
   • c) impulsive behavior;
   • d) irritability and aggression, manifested as frequently assaults others, or engages in fighting;
   • e) blatantly disregards safety of self and others;
   • f) a pattern of irresponsibility and
   • g) lack of remorse for actions.

            (See article by David Porter at Exhibit A.)

Samples of OPSB-related court decisions

Lina Saleh Ahmed Alghamdi

6. During 2021, another victim/target of the Applicant (“OPSB”) and its accomplices (the “Syndicate”) was subjected to a Courts of Justice Act (“CJA”) S. 140 vexatious Application: her name was Lina Saleh Ahmed Alghamdi¹ (“Alghamdi”).
7. An Ottawa-based lawyer, J.F. Lalonde (“Lalonde”)—who, coincidentally, refused to be retained by me in 2016—acted for OPSB.
8. On 20211207, Alghamdi was apparently² declared vexatious by Justice Andra Pollak (“Pollak”) who prohibited her from initiating or continuing any proceeding against the respondents³ without leave of a judge of Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice (“SCJ”) (see Exhibit B, para. [1]).
9. On 20220919, Alghamdi’s appeal of the 20211207 decision was heard by Appelant court judges K. van Rensburg (“Rensburg”), G. Pardu (“Pardu”) and J. Copeland (“Copeland”) (“Rensburg-Pardu-Copeland panel”) who—despite acknowledging that Pollak’s reasons were “sparse”—denied the appeal.
10. In fact, the only “decision” considered by the Rensburg-Pardu-Copeland panel was that Pollak noted “many of these [CJA 140] principles are applicable in the proceedings commenced by the Respondent. I thus find that the Applicants have met their burden of proving that the Respondent is a vexatious litigant as set out by s. 140 of the Courts of Justice Act” (see Exhibit B, para. [8]).
11. The Rensburg-Pardu-Copeland panel then went on to discount Alghamdi’s evidence to a value of zero—just as was done in both of my appeals. See:
    • a) CYFSA-related Appeal materials at 20230719 Affidavit #1 Exhibit I versus scandalous, defamatory decision (esp. mocking para. [268]!!) at Exhibit C and
    • b) Family-related Appeal materials at 20230803 Affidavit #2 Exhibit O versus scandalously empty decision and cost award at 20230803 Affidavit #2 Exhibit P⁴.
12. The Rensburg-Pardu-Copeland panel evidenced their collusion with OPSB et al. by making outrageous and defamatory statements including, but not limited to:
    • a) at [26]: “The documents filed by the appellant are characterized by vitriol expressed towards anyone who does not agree with her. She has alleged broad conspiracies which seem utterly farfetched.” (emphasis added)
    • b) at [26]: “She accuses the application judge, the police, lawyers and numerous agencies of lying, fraud or conspiracy.”⁵
    • c) at [27]: Apparently, Alghamdi’s inability to record her own rape/torture was a factor considered by the Rensburg-Pardu-Copeland panel: “There is nothing in the recording she showed to us that supports her allegations that she was tortured, sexually assaulted, and left half-naked and bleeding.”⁶
    • d) at [28]: “The OIPRD also reviewed the recording and concluded that the appellant’s complaints against the police were not substantiated.”⁷
    • e) at [29]: “The appellant argued before the LTB that she did not receive notice of a hearing before that board, and that it was just by happenstance that she attended at the place, date and time set for the hearing of the respondent’s claims against her in that forum.”⁸
13. Furthermore, at para. [30], Alghamdi’s being provoked into a physical reaction to terrorization by a protected Synidicate member was converted into an assault charge and deemed malicious—exactly my experience in Newfoundland (“NL”) (see Exhibit G⁹).
14. At para. [31], the fact that Alghamdi had not paid illegally-obtained cost awards was used against her; just as it’s being used against me (see 20230719 Affidavit #1 Exihibit C 33)
15. At para. [35], the Rensburg-Pardu-Copeland panel concluded with a decision-free cost award in favour of OPSB—not quite as ridiculous as the Copeland-infused cost decision against me (see 20230803 Affidavit #2 Exhibit P¹⁰) when that 3-judge panel favoured the fraudsters (already noted at para. 11 b., especially in light of the evidence noted at para. 11 a. above).
16. Alghamdi alleged collusion, as I am, and she likely evidenced it¹¹, as I have (again, see 20230719 Affidavit #1, 20230803 Affidavit #2, 20230804 Affidavit #3 and 20230808 Affidavit #4).

 

Yves Chevalier and George Basmadji

17. Setting aside the complicity of Justice Heather Williams in organized crime (partially described at 20230719 Affidavit #1 Exhibit B, sub-exhibit c) for the time being, based upon the evidence that I have amassed against:
    • a) OPSB,
    • b) Sally Gomery (see 20230808 Affidavit #4, footnote 3 with exhibits 1 and B.2) and
    • c) many other judges, associate judges, masters and justices of the peace, it is likely that everything claimed by Yves Chevalier and George Basmadji (“scientist”) was accurate including, but not limited to:
      • i) at para. [6]: “… two judges ostensibly for the crimes of obstruction of justice, criminal fraud, and criminal breach of trust …”
      • ii) at para [7]: “… allegations about the judges’ fitness to continue to serve in their judicial offices … views of Canadian democracy.”
      • iii) at para. [8]: “…court officials … sued for “failing to provide the [victims of crimes] with the support & services they needed in relation to … court proceedings.”

18. Not only did SCJ’s Myers dismiss and stay the scientist’s actions, the court threatened to revoke one of their fee waiver certificates!

(See Chevalier v. Williams, 2022 ONSC 3847 at Exhibit I.)

 

Coralie Perkins-Aboagye

19. On 20151103, now-retired Justice Robert N. Beaudoin (“Beaudoin”) invited Coralie Perkins-Aboagye (“Perkins”) to submit written submissions as to why the court should not dismiss her action as being frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of process (see Perkins-Aboagye v. Becker, 2015 ONSC 7366 at Exhibit J).
20. In 2019, I was not afforded the same courtesy as Perkins when two of my supplementary actions againgst Victor Vallance Blais (“VVB”) were dismissed by Beaudoin (see … oh, nothing—as it’s as impossible to prove that I received no invitation as it is to prove that I:
    • a) have never received an eviction notice,
    • b) do not suffer from any chronic mental illness and
    • c) never abandoned my children and moved to Texas (as they were told by their wicked father shortly before he arranged for my arrest and detention to have the divorce trial cancelled.)

 

The Reality of Canada’s Capital City

21. Beaudoin knew that I had much more evidence of VVB’s involvement in Taxpayer-funded Domesic Violence and Child Abuse (“#TDVCA”) (see main civil action against VVB at Exhibit K) and—just as sociopathic spouse John Kiska (“Kiska”) began to build a false history of my “mental illness and criminal tendencies” in 2013 (see 20230803 Affidavit #2 Exhibit K) for his long-term, insidious:
    • a) de-frauding of me (ongoing, with the help of OPSB et al.),
    • b) de-faming of me (ongoing, with the help of OPSB et al.) and
    • c) torture of me (onging, with the help of OPSB et al.),

VVB and Beaudoin similarly began to build a false history of “vexatious litigant” in 2019 to assist Kiska and all of his other accomplices.

22. I attempted to file a police complaint against Beaudoin with OPSB: I also attempted to initiate a private investigation (see Exhibit L); however, Ottawa’s Justices of the Peace are equally as protective of organized crime as are OPSB and Ottawa Mayors.
23. Law enforcement and judicial services in Ottawa? It’s a front for organized crime and a playground for sociopaths—as described at paras. 1-5 above.
24. This Ottawa-based Syndicate protects a massive white-, blue-, thug-collar crime ring guilty of not just fraud and theft; but torture, trafficking in persons and terrorist activities as defined in the Criminal Code of Canada.
25. As of 20230817, the Syndicate is seemingly also being protected by members of the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary and the Royal Canadian Mounted police (see/hear Exhibit M).

Endnotes

¹ Similar to my legal matters, Alghamdi’s name is spelled differently in various endorsements if they are reported in CanLii.org at all. This, obviously, renders further evidencing court-enabled organized crime somewhat challenging.

² Like many of the endorsements prepared in my legal matters, often orders are not prepared (eg. Pamela MacEachern’s most recent performance in Family court (see 20230803 Affidavit #2, Exhibit O) and decisions are not reported to CanLii.org and/or cannot be easily found.

³ Restriction was against OPSB only; so, likely, Pollak could be perceived as being unbiased by not endorsing the outrageous request made by OPSB to have her denied access to all branches of court—a typical courtroom maneuvre.

⁴ Note that this Copeland-infused panel also included Matheson from my CYFSA 3-judge panel noted at para 11 a.

⁵ There are numerous judges, lawyers, police and agencies lying, committing fraud and colluding in torts and crime (see 20230719 Affidavit #1 with exhibits A-C, 20230803 Affidavit #2 with exhibits A-Q, 20230804 Affidavit #3 with exhibits A-D and 20230808 Affidavit #4 with exhibits A-J, for starters).

⁶ No video evidence of being tortured and raped by police? How ridiculous; and, how typical of how OPSB investigates sexual assault (see 20230804 Affidavit #3 Exhibit C , sub-exhibit 2. a) and a Break & Enter (see 20230804 Affidavit #3 Exhibit C , sub-exhibit 2. b)

⁷ That means nothing: OIPRD is as complicit in organized crimes as is the Law Society of Ontario (see OIPRD File at Exhibit D)

⁸ No notice of an LTB hearing? That sounds familiar: that’s exactly how my 3-bedroom home was emptied while I was falsely accused and detained in Quebec (see materials ignored by Justice Ryan Bell at Exhibit E and her self-incriminating decision released at Exhibit F so that multiple thieves could be protected and rewarded.)

⁹ Note that once the NL Crown received a copy of my S. 699 Application (see Exhibit H), all four bogus charges were instantly dropped—as no one wants me to obtain complete, third-party records that evidence Ontario’s Syndicate (see Affidavit #2 paras. 2-5 and related exhibits C-G).

¹⁰ This 3-judge panel included soon-to-be-notorious SCJ Appellant judge Matheson from my denied CYFSA appeal

¹¹ We know that judges ignore evidence to favour fraudsters and abusive spouses/parents; as does OPSB, the Office of the Crown Attorney, the Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa, the Office of the Children’s Lawyer, the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee and more (again, see 20230719 Affidavit #1 with exhibits A-C, 20230803 Affidavit #2 with exhibits A-Q, 20230804 Affidavit #3 with exhibits A-D and 20230808 Affidavit #4 with exhibits A-J … for starters)

1. On 20230628, Gardiner Roberts LLP¹ denied consent to the late filing of my reply in CV-22-89804 Moore vs. Addelman-Snir (“Reply”) following an orchestrated delay by co-defendant Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP² (see 20230803 Affidavit #2 Exhibits A and B).
2. On 20230608, my motion for an extension in time to file my Reply was heard by Justice Marie T. Fortier (“Fortier”) who:

• a) refused to recuse herself when I detailed her bias against me³ and
• b) reserved her decision.
• (See 20230719 Affidavit #1 Exhibit A and 20230803 Affidavit #2 Exhibit B)

3. On 20230706, the Applicant’s counsel, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (“BLG”) served an affidavit that it knew, or ought to have known, was laden with errors, omissions and malicious obfuscation (see 20230804 #3 with Exhibits A-D for a description of BLG’s motivation and work-in-progress analysis of the severity of their defamatory libel at Exhibit J and, as time permits, at https://twb.rocks/organized-crime/vis/michelle-doody/ottawa-police-services-board_cv-21-00087056_20230706-opsb-affidavit-eomo_deirdre-moore-sean-kiska-cate-kiska_john-kiska).
4. I then realized that Fortier’s scheduling endorsement had set me up for failure⁴ as she:

a) provided to BLG four months to prepare their Affidavit while limiting me to only one month to prepare a response,

b) unlawfully ordered that late materials would not be accepted⁵ and

c) ordered an exchange of Factums on the same day versus the usual process of permitting the respondent several days to respond⁶ to an applicant’s arguments.

(See endorsement at Exhibit C)

5. Accordingly, I brought this Motion to seek amendments to Fortier’s unfair, unlawful schedule.
6. Given Corthorn’s Addelman-Snir decision where she fully discounted all of my evidence to a value of zero merely because it was hyperlinked to my Affidavits (see 20230803 Affidavit #2 Exhibit B), I am also seeking leave for that.
7. OPSB is well aware that:

• a) in July 2022, I fled to Newfoundland to report Ontario’s crime syndicate,
• b) I am in between homeless shelters and
• c) due to non-stop theft, fraud and targeting, I have an income of exactly zero;
• however, their consent for a virtual “cross examination” is both cryptic … and disturbing (see Exhibit D).

8. Accordingly, I am also seeking leave for that.
9. On 20230606, obfuscation by BLG—to ensure I would not obtain the third-party records required to fully defend their vexatious allegation (see 20230803 Affidavit #2 Exhibit D) —resulted in an adjournment of my motion until a 90-minute hearing could occur (see 20230606 Labrosse endorsement at 20230803 Affidavit #2 Exhibit E).
10. According to Calendly, there are zero 90-minute Civil court time slots available until 2024—after the vexatious Application is scheduled to be heard: accordingly, I am also seeking a delay in these ridiculous vexatious proceedings.
11. Given that which has transpired since my claim was last amended, I am also seeking leave to amend my pleading to:

• a) include paragraphs that detail how the OPSB again shirked its responsibility by deeming the obvious Fraud detailed in 20230719 Affidavit #1 Exhibit B “a civil matter”,
• b) improve my description of how OPSB enables crime,
• c) describe how all⁷ of OPSB’s bogus charges were dropped in 20220524 after sole custody and access was unlawfully⁸ awarded to Kiska and Sean & Cate were fully convinced that:
  • i. I abandoned them (see CAS files upon receipt where daughter was told I moved to Texas because I did not want to be her mother any longer while I’ve never stayed one .. single .. day .. in Texas),
  • ii. I am mentally ill (see literally any OPSB file or any court document not prepared by me) and
  • iii. I am dangerous (see 20230803 Affidavit #2 Exhibit F evidencing how Sean & Cate were coerced into filing charges of criminal harassment against me in April 2021 when I was merely attempting to see what my they looked like via their Instagram accounts following four years as they grew to ages 15 ½ & 17 from 11 & 12 ½)⁹, 
• d) triple the quantum sought in my pleading to $39.6M¹⁰; thrice the amount that OPSB and the City of Ottawa milked from Ottawa taxpayers in 2020 (see Exhibit E) as more victims have come forward including, but not limited to, Jason Shen, https://twitter.com/DontDateACop and https://twitter.com/OttawaPatriot88,
• e) add as co-defendents:
  • i. BLG,
  • ii. City of Ottawa,
  • iii. Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centree and
  • iv. Province of Ontario
  • given:
  • v. their involvement in OPSB oversight (see 20230804 Affidavit #3, Exhibit B, C and D) and
  • vi. the apathy, incompetence and/or involvement of the City Councillor responsible for my ward: Riley Brockington (see Exhibit F ).

12. In October 2020, I was forced to leave my passport with OPSB (see Release Order at Exhibit H) and they have refused to return it; clearly another violation of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms—so, I’ll also be seeking an order for that.
13. In 2014, while unlawfully detained at The Ottawa Hospital for an entire summer so impossible-to-divorce spouse John Kiska could:

• a) build a false history of mental illness (see 20230803 Affidavit #2, Exhibit O) and
• b) more easily gaslight my perfect children, Sean and Cate

I designed a healing centre that could be used to assist others’ recovery from domestic violence (see sketch at Exhibit I); however, I would like to expand it as clearly victims of OPSB require assistance too.

14. There’ll be an ocean-side plot of land available somewhere in the Maritimes for us to build; meanwhile, 1030 Thomson Lane (https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25906354/1030-thompson-lane-lake-of-bays) has enough space to help us get started with a corporate headquarters.
15. Accordingly, I’ll be seeking a pre-judgment award of $10M in order to purchase that.
16. Sean, Cate and I have suffered enough.

 

#SlashTheirBudget #SendThemPacking #Torture #HumanTrafficking #Domestic Terrorism

¹ This firm represents Gonen Snir and has already committed crime to perpetuate his theft/fraud which has been reported to authorities (see Exhibit A or more complete report here: https://twb.rocks/organized-crime/20230727_rnc-complaint_addelman-snir-gardiner-roberts_fraud-theft-forgery-false-sworn-statement)

² This firm represents Joe Addelman and are being exposed as being involved in organized crime as well see 20230719 Affidavit #1 Exhibit B.

³ Unlike fraudster Sally Gomery who recused herself upon request when I explained how her scandalous decision favouring Victor Vallance Blais LLP (“VVB”) (see evidence in the cost submission at Exhibit B) was actually a crime pursuant to S. 126 “Disobey a Statute” of the Criminal Code of Canada (“CCC”); the same one now-retired Justice Robert Beaudoin committed in 2019 when he reviewed partial evidence submitted by VVB—without any of my testimony or other evidence—to have two of my other civil actions against them unlawfully struck/deemed vexatious.

⁴ Not unlike the manner in which VVB and faux mediator Carol Bartels set me up for financial failure by “mediating” a Shared Parenting Agreement that did not speak to spousal or child support (see 20230803 Affidavit #2 Exhibit K)

⁵ See CJA’s Rules of Civil Procedure for a reminder.

⁶ See CJA’s Rules of Civil Procedure for a reminder.

⁷ Except one: unlawfully in dwelling (which was kept to “justify” the illegally-obtained (via extortion) unlawful 3-year Probation Order

⁸ Canada’s Divorce Act has jurisdiction over custody and access of children from a marriage; not the Child, Youth and Family Services Act—it’s called federal paramountcy.

⁹ Syndicate members are, at a minimum, sociopaths. See table identifying how they descended at Exhibit G.

¹⁰ Ontario taxpayers don’t need to worry about funding our $39.6M settlement as Ford can simply sue all of the law firms involved to recoup the funds: at $400-500/hour for nothing but copy-and-paste documents (as alleged at “Sell Again Law“), unless they’ve snorted it all up, they should have plenty of cash.

 

LIST OF EXHIBITS

Ex	Date	Description	# of pages
A	20230727	RNC Police Complaint #4 re: Gardiner Roberts (Forgery, False Sworn Document) & confirmation re: Manuel Spurell	9
B.1       B.2	20210311       20210224	Cost Submission evidencing the illegality of the Cavanagh LLP-Justice Sally Gomery Rule 21 Motion used to delay justice.   Gomery’s laughable endorsement regarding stay of proceedings	40   20
C	20230308	Marie T. Fortier’s biased scheduling endorsement	3
D	20230717	E-mail exchange regarding virtual cross examination	1
E	20201209	OPSB & Ottawa City Hall milks $13.2M from Ottawa taxpayers (https://twb.rocks/living/opinion/00000008_can-a-mayor-be-impeached_saqotu-002)	4
F.1     F.2	20230804     20200218	Meet City of Ottawa Councillor Riley Brockington (part 2) “Good Riddance”   Meet City of Ottawa Councillor Riley Brockington (part 1) “Contact the RCMP”	5     3
G	2020	Outline: Descending into Sociopathy (https://twb.rocks/organized-crime/descending-into-sociopathy)	1
H	20201013     20230726   20230420	Releaser Order w OPSB theft of passport at para. 5 (during convid) and forced GPS-monitoring at para. 11   Another request for return of passport   E-mail from Doody regarding date of passport theft	2     1   3
I	20140808	Sketch of SAQOTU Inc.’s healing centres	1
J	ongoing	Errors, Omissions & Malicious Obfuscation: Murphy’s 20230706 Affidavit (https://twb.rocks/organized-crime/vis/michelle-doody/ottawa-police-services-board_cv-21-00087056_20230706-opsb-affidavit-eomo_deirdre-moore-sean-kiska-cate-kiska_john-kiska)	?

1. At time of writing, the Applicant (“OPSB”) is aware, or ought to be aware, that I am not vexatious (see 20230719 Affidavit #1 (“Aff#1”) and 20230803 Affidavit #2 (“Aff#2”)).

2. OPSB is also aware, or ought to be aware that I have been trafficked¹ through the Ontario Court of Justice (“OCJ”) and every branch of the Superior Court of Justice (“SCJ”) in order to be de-frauded, tortured and terrorized by—not merely impossible-to-divorce John Kiska (“Kiska”)—but:   
   • a) taxpayer-funded individuals operating through entities including, but not limited to:
     • i. The Ottawa Hospital,
     • ii. Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre,
     • iii. Suroit Hospital,
     • iv. Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa,
     • v. Office of the Children’s Lawyer,
     • vi. Ontario’s Ministry of the Attorney General,
     • vii. the Office of the Auditor Attorney General of Canada; and
   • b) Legal Aid-funded and/or privately-funded lawyers operating through entities including, but not limited to:
     • i. Bell Baker LLP,
     • ii. Victor Vallance Blais LLP,
     • iii. Addelman Baum Gilbert Robinson LLP,
     • iv. Snir Law Office,
     • v. Cavanagh LLP,
     • vi. Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP,
     • vii. Gardiner Roberts LLP,
     • viii. Gowling WLG International
     • ix. McCarthy Tétrault LLP,
     • x. Cedric Nahum Law,
     • xi. Galarneau & Associates Professional Corporation and
     • xii. Patricia Brown Barrister and Solicitor;

   collectively, “Syndicate Members”.

3. Given the potential value of my current and pending civil actions against the Syndicate Members (see Exhibit A), OPSB administration²—and/or their counsel, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (“BLG”)—being financially rewarded and/or extorted into to denying me access to justice via its vexatious S. 140 Application is not just likely, it’s probable.

4. Only one question remains: armed with so much evidence of wide-spread, Ottawa-based crime, why hasn’t OPSB arrested any Syndicate Members³?

#SlashTheirBudget #SendThemPacking #Torture #HumanTrafficking #Domestic Terrorism

¹ A violation of the Criminal Code of Canada pursuant to S. 279.01(1) which states that “every person who recruits, transports, transfers, receives, holds, conceals or harbours a person, or exercises control, direction or influence over the movements of a person, for the purpose of exploiting them or facilitating their exploitation is guilty of an indictable offence and liable:

(a) to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of five years if they kidnap, commit an aggravated assault or aggravated sexual assault against, or cause death to, the victim during the commission of the offence; or

(b) to imprisonment for a term of not more than 14 years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of four years in any other case.

² See current OPSB members at Exhibit B.

³ Could municipal leadership at the City of Ottawa be willfully blind (see Exhibits C and D) in order to perpetuate lucrative organized crime and domestic terrorism in Canada’s capital?

1. On 20230131, the Applicant (“OPSB”) malicious brought a S. 140 Application in order to protect a
   number of individuals and/or entities that are involved in organized crime.
2. At least two of the criminals that OPSB is protecting, and now harbouring, are Jewish; namely, Joe Addelman and Gonen Snir (see Exhibit A).
3. The new Chair of the OPSB is Jewish: the respondent (“Moore”) is a follower of Christ.
4. By 20230630, OPSB was well aware that Moore was not vexatious (see Exhibit B); however, they chose to continue to deceive the court with a 20230706 Affidavit that was laden with errors, omissions and malicious obfuscation (see Exhibit C).

#SlashTheirBudget #SendThemPacking #Torture #HumanTrafficking #Domestic Terrorism